Since 2003 it appears Beckett is slightly ahead of PSA..
olb31
Posts: 3,480 ✭✭✭✭✭
in terms of sheer number, but not by much. Each year Beckett holds its own in PSA but the newer it the card gets the more traction Beckett gains. Any thoughts?
Work hard and you will succeed!!
0
Comments
<< <i>in terms of sheer number, but not by much. Each year Beckett holds its own in PSA but the newer it the card gets the more traction Beckett gains. Any thoughts? >>
What are you referencing? Number of cards graded?
PSA has 90% market share of new submissions.
<< <i>Yes the number graded. I did a quick search on EBAY listings from 2003 and up, it's close, but Beckett has graded a few more. Maybe this isn't the best way to view it, but it does say something. >>
I see. Cards manufactured in 2003 and forward.
What was the number of cards that turned up in your search?
Look at 2010 Bowman Chrome Prospects. PSA graded 2524, BGS 4565
2013 Topps base: PSA graded 2935, BGS 456.
2013 bowman chrome prospects PSA 218, BGS 1082.
2013 bowman base PSA 1186, bgs 203.
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
<< <i>Who is MacKinnon? >>
Hockey, Nathan I believe?
<< <i>
<< <i>Who is MacKinnon? >>
Hockey, Nathan I believe? >>
Yep
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
<< <i>Speaking of, anyone know who this Clayton Kershank guy is? A lot of baseball people seem to think he's good at tossing the ball. >>
First time I saw him at a spring training game I thought every pitch he made w/o runners on base would be a balk if there were. Amazing that he can switch between that and a normal throwing motion w/no loss of effectiveness. He is pretty good at tossing the ball