Home Sports Talk

Picks for AFC and NFC Championship Games

Let's get 'em, fellas

NE 27
Indy 23


Seattle 34
GB 21

Comments

  • MGLICKERMGLICKER Posts: 7,995 ✭✭✭
    Indy 28
    NE 21

    GB 27
    Seattle 2
  • FavreFan1971FavreFan1971 Posts: 3,103 ✭✭✭
    NE 31
    Indy 27

    GB 24
    SEA 31

    Hard to type it but I have to be a realist.
  • CNoteCNote Posts: 2,070


    << <i>Indy 28
    NE 21

    GB 27
    Seattle 2 >>



    Glad to see you're consistent with your love of Seattle image
  • bronco2078bronco2078 Posts: 10,227 ✭✭✭✭✭


    NE 49- Indy 42

    GB 28- Seattle 0
  • JustacommemanJustacommeman Posts: 22,847 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Seattle 28- Green Bay 20

    New England 34- Indy 27


    MJ
    Walker Proof Digital Album
    Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 30,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Indy 35 Pats 31. Seattle 27 Green Bay 24
  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 7,861 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The reason Dallas didn't beat GB wasn't because of the Dez call, but because of their inability to put a gimpy Rodgers on the deck. Even a guy with one-and-a-half legs and next to no mobility will eventually find a receiver if given enough time. Those seconds in the pocket will be drastically reduced this coming weekend. Eddie Lacy better ball like he never has before for them to have any hope of pulling it off. I say no hope.

    Sea 27, GB 17



    Prior to last weekend's games I predicted an AFC roadie would be triumphant, but I couldn't wrap my mind around which one because I felt like Bal & Indy could each win their respective games. Now I know which one. I have a funny feeling about this game. It "feels" like Andrew Luck is about ready to ascend to the top of the AFC QB chain, disposing of the two best in consecutive weeks. But it will ultimately hinge on their defense. Earlier this season I watched Big Ben throw for 522 & 6 on the Colts, and it was one of the most pathetic displays you'll ever see. Fast forward to yesterday and I hardly recognized Indy's D.....in a good way. If they duplicate that performance against the Pats...

    Indy 27, NE 24

    you'll never be able to outrun a bad diet

  • Home field holds for both conferences.

    Seattle 27
    Green Bay 14

    I really like Rodgers, but I think he has little chance if he can't move any better than he did against Dallas. Seattle will hit him and often.


    New England 35
    Colts 7

    Belichick will have Luck's number on defense and the Colts defense will revert to their old ways in the cold.


  • BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,492 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Patriots 52
    Colts 24

    Seahawks 28
    Packers 24
  • seebelowseebelow Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭
    Hmm one guy did pick Indy. But then again he thinks Seattle scores just two points. Hey, props to sticking to your guns.
    Interested in higher grade vintage cards. Aren't we all. image
  • WhiteTornadoWhiteTornado Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭
    NE 35, IND 20. I think Belichick outsmarts Luck and Pagano.

    SEA 29, GB 17. Seattle's on a roll and this game ain't in Lambeau.
  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,533 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hmmmmmmmmm....

    NE 31 INDY 21

    SEA 27 GB 17

    Dave
    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • MCMLVToppsMCMLVTopps Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Indy 35 Pats 31 ??????

    Paul, have you gone to the dark side??? If you think our beloved Pats could get 31 points, surely you could go at least 5 more and put the Pats on top!!
  • BrickBrick Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Indy 31
    NE 28

    Dallas... errr... I mean Pack 17
    Seattle 10

    Packers 38
    Indy 21
    Collecting 1960 Topps Baseball in PSA 8
    http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/

    Ralph

  • dennis07dennis07 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭
    NE 34 INDY 17

    SEA 34 GB 17
    Collecting 1970 Topps baseball
  • This content has been removed.
  • seebelowseebelow Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭
    I think the home teams do it again. I'm just wondering who matches up best vs NE,...GB or Seattle?
    Interested in higher grade vintage cards. Aren't we all. image
  • ChiefsFan1stChiefsFan1st Posts: 845 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The reason Dallas didn't beat GB wasn't because of the Dez call, but because of their inability to put a gimpy Rodgers on the deck. Even a guy with one-and-a-half legs and next to no mobility will eventually find a receiver if given enough time. Those seconds in the pocket will be drastically reduced this coming weekend. Eddie Lacy better ball like he never has before for them to have any hope of pulling it off. I say no hope.

    Sea 27, GB 17



    Prior to last weekend's games I predicted an AFC roadie would be triumphant, but I couldn't wrap my mind around which one because I felt like Bal & Indy could each win their respective games. Now I know which one. I have a funny feeling about this game. It "feels" like Andrew Luck is about ready to ascend to the top of the AFC QB chain, disposing of the two best in consecutive weeks. But it will ultimately hinge on their defense. Earlier this season I watched Big Ben throw for 522 & 6 on the Colts, and it was one of the most pathetic displays you'll ever see. Fast forward to yesterday and I hardly recognized Indy's D.....in a good way. If they duplicate that performance against the Pats...

    Indy 27, NE 24 >>


    Excellent write-up on the Dallas/Green Bay game! I was watching that one with the father-in-law and we both decided that Rodgers should of gone out
    for pizza and rented a movie while he was gimping around looking for a receiver!! I LITERALLY think there were a few plays he had 8-10 seconds without
    the Dallas pass rush in his zip code. If Rodgers would of been healthy, that would of been a slaughter.

    I also agree with your no-hope for GB statement. Like it or not, its the Seattle show from here on out.

    In the AFC, the Pats take it. But it dont matter in the long run
    I dont wanna grow up, Im a Toys-R-Us kid!
  • pocketpiececommemspocketpiececommems Posts: 5,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    NE and Seattle. Then the Chiefs can say that they beat both of the teams playing in the Super Bowl.image
  • ChiefsFan1stChiefsFan1st Posts: 845 ✭✭✭


    << <i>NE and Seattle. Then the Chiefs can say that they beat both of the teams playing in the Super Bowl.image >>


    image

    I bet that hasnt happened too many times in NFL history. To have a non-playoff team beat what would
    eventually be the super bowl contenders.

    Quite possibly another obscure record for the Chiefs... like what team managed a complete season w/out
    a TD pass to a receiverimage
    I dont wanna grow up, Im a Toys-R-Us kid!
  • telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,898 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm not really a fan of any of the surviving teams- that said, a wounded Rodgers against Seattle's D spells trouble. My heart wants GB to pull it off but realistically, Seattle 30 GB 24. As to the other game, Brady will rise to the challenge. NE 27 IND 17.

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • bronco2078bronco2078 Posts: 10,227 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm not really a fan of any of the surviving teams- that said, a wounded Rodgers against Seattle's D spells trouble. My heart wants GB to pull it off but realistically, Seattle 30 GB 24. As to the other game, Brady will rise to the challenge. NE 27 IND 17. >>




    Rodgers isn't hurt . To hear all the talk about his leg is getting ridiculous . Should someone call the make-a-wish foundation ? It's beginning to sound like he is terminal image
  • telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,898 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I'm not really a fan of any of the surviving teams- that said, a wounded Rodgers against Seattle's D spells trouble. My heart wants GB to pull it off but realistically, Seattle 30 GB 24. As to the other game, Brady will rise to the challenge. NE 27 IND 17. >>




    Rodgers isn't hurt . To hear all the talk about his leg is getting ridiculous . Should someone call the make-a-wish foundation ? It's beginning to sound like he is terminal image >>



    He's definitely injured...the calf muscle damage is confirmed...but how badly he's injured, that's the question. A recent interview has him saying that he feels "about the same" as last week, which basically says nothing (perhaps by design, who knows).

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
Sign In or Register to comment.