Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

The Most Legitimately Tough Cards...

I have been actively collecting cards again for a little over five years now and I am always intrigued by cards that are legitimately tough. Sure there are plenty of low pop cards but that can be for a number of reasons and not simply because they are condition sensitive.

In the genre of cards I collect a few quickly come to mind.

1982 Wrestling All Stars Series B Rick Martel with only one PSA 8 and one PSA 9.

1985 OPC King Kong Bundy. This card is tough in a PSA 7 with none graded higher. Perhaps the toughest base card I have ever seen from any relatively modern set.

I am curious what some of the other super tough cards are.




Comments

  • DanBessetteDanBessette Posts: 6,421 ✭✭✭
    The first one that came to mind was the Valenzuela RC
  • MULLINS5MULLINS5 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭
    1979 Topps and OPC Mike Bossy #161. Goodness gracious that one is always OC!
  • eagles33eagles33 Posts: 2,683 ✭✭✭
    Here are a couple off the top of my head

    The 1983 Warren Moon Jogo card is always OC.

    1986 Topps Steve Young. Pretty low percentage of 10s compared to others in the set if I remember right.

    1998 Tiger Woods 1997 Masters Gold Foil card. The black borders make this one near impossible.
    Scans of most of my Misc rookies can be found <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://forums.collectors.com/m...y&keyword1=Non%20major">here
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    I think there's a big difference between "tough in top grade" versus legitimately tough.

    The 1975 Topps Mike Schmidt card is truly godawful tough to find in PSA 10 Gem Mint condition, but it's not a legitimately tough card. I can find (dozens of) examples on Ebay every day of the week.

    A 1982 FBI disc of Schmidt is legitimately tough, raw or low grade (high grade is merely a dream). a Felin's Frank Richie Ashburn card is legitimately tough -- in fact, all Felin's Franks Phillies cards are tough.

    As much as I enjoy chasing high grades on my a few of my modern endeavours, I much more enjoy chasing the legitimately tough cards that are so scarce that grade is no longer an important consideration.

    m
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • thehallmarkthehallmark Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭
    1979 Topps Ozzie Newsome RC. Among the modern(ish) NFL HOF RCs, that one is the beast.

    That set is full of centering problems in all four directions, including tilting. This card also tends to have a fisheye problem. If you can get over those two hurdles you have the flimsy stock to deal with...lots of edge chipping.

    I've owned ~10 of the PSA 9s since I began collecting and not one of them has felt like a contender to grade higher.
  • seebelowseebelow Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭
    Agree 79 ozzie
    ..76 Brett
    Somewhat the yaz rookie without printing defects.
    the 63 mantles have those spots, smudges And I've found difficult

    Opened a ton of 81 topps vending and def agree on the 81 Fernando
    Interested in higher grade vintage cards. Aren't we all. image
  • IronmanfanIronmanfan Posts: 5,505 ✭✭✭✭
    1980 Cal Ripken Charlotte O's Police Issue

    IMF
    Successful dealings with Wcsportscards94558, EagleEyeKid, SamsGirl214, Volver, DwayneDrain, Oaksey25, Griffins, Cardfan07, Etc.
  • DanBessetteDanBessette Posts: 6,421 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I much more enjoy chasing the legitimately tough cards that are so scarce that grade is no longer an important consideration. >>



    Like most Topps Venezuelans.
  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think all of these are great answers. We can all agree that there is rare and then there is condition rare.

    Both are fun to chase.

    A few months back I started a thread about the Rax Roast Beef wrestling cards. Those are extremely rare and in reality are just as rare as the Charlotte O's Cal Ripken. That said the value will never come close to that of the Ripken simply because of demand.

    Here is a scan of some raw Bundy's. I pulled these out of a box of vending singles and it is amazing how tough this card is to find in even gradable condition. There is one so far in the pop report that I submitted and I only did so because the centering was the best I had ever seen on the card. This is the type of condition sensitive rare card that would be truly a needle in a haystack if found in high grade.


    image




  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1987 Kahn's Reds Larkin rookie - a 6th one total was just graded recently, highest so far is an 8 (until my next sub pops image ). Centered cards are tough to find and the red borders on thin cardstock chip easily.
  • IndianaJonesIndianaJones Posts: 346 ✭✭✭
    I wouldn't underestimate cards that are scarce because of their condition sensitivity, particularly when their sensitively traces to the manner in which the cards were issued. When the cards were poorly and/or cheaply made to begin with, that's one thing. It is nigh on quite another when they were issued in such a way to virtually guarantee condition degradation right from the time they left the factory for the marketplace. Come on, think about it----when cards of necessity must be hand-cut off the package, or were used as a package stiffener for hot dogs, or were tossed in a bag of snack chips, or were over-sized and kids logically assumed the best thing to do with them, since they wouldn't fit in with their 'ol Topps, was to decorate their bedroom walls with them---using one-sided or double-sided Scotch tape, pins, nails, thumbtacks. If a card could talk, "HELP!! MOIDER!"

    Food for thought. ---Indiana Jones (Brian Powell)
  • miwlvrnmiwlvrn Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1973 OPC 1 All Time H.R. Ldrs. B.Ruth/H.Aaron/W.Mays

  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>1973 OPC 1 All Time H.R. Ldrs. B.Ruth/H.Aaron/W.Mays >>




    Good one!


    I just checked the pop report and this one definitely qualifies.
  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I wouldn't underestimate cards that are scarce because of their condition sensitivity, particularly when their sensitively traces to the manner in which the cards were issued. When the cards were poorly and/or cheaply made to begin with, that's one thing. It is nigh on quite another when they were issued in such a way to virtually guarantee condition degradation right from the time they left the factory for the marketplace. Come on, think about it----when cards of necessity must be hand-cut off the package, or were used as a package stiffener for hot dogs, or were tossed in a bag of snack chips, or were over-sized and kids logically assumed the best thing to do with them, since they wouldn't fit in with their 'ol Topps, was to decorate their bedroom walls with them---using one-sided or double-sided Scotch tape, pins, nails, thumbtacks. If a card could talk, "HELP!! MOIDER!"

    Food for thought. ---Indiana Jones (Brian Powell) >>




    I agree.

    One of the primary sets I collect came in a hot cocoa mix box and they are not only rare but very condition sensitive.

    I have been very intrigued by the Mantle Dan Dee Chips card for this very reason.


  • MinorLeaguerMinorLeaguer Posts: 514 ✭✭✭
    12 years and counting looking for a 1979 Montreal Juniors Denis Savard so that has been personally my most tough card. I don't even know what it looks like. Many junior hockey card images often get re-used on cards that are released years later when a player makes noise in the NHL. If that's, the case, this just might be the card:


    image

    and the re-used image in this 2013-14 release:


    image
  • IndianaJonesIndianaJones Posts: 346 ✭✭✭
    Dpeck 100------Wishing you the very best in 2015 towards hunting down your rare game as once found in a hot cocoa mix box! Sounds like fun! Don't be concerned about me; I'm not any of your competitors for your prized game.

    You bring up a prime example of which I was referring to----------the 1954 Mickey Mantle Dan Dee potato chips card.

    To be sure, the Dan Dees (the same would go for Stahl-Meyers, Wilsons, Bell Brands, Morrell Meats, and so on) that have graded PSA 8-9 or the equivalent by SGC, most likely escaped being inserted in a bag or unyielding tin of those wonderful salty, oily chips. During the hobby's burgeoning years of the 70s, a very few finds of these cards were brought to shows, or purchased by collector / dealers who were offering what was then serious money for old cards. Once these pristine gems were made available to collectors at a show, they were usually ALL sold by either show's end, or the very FIRST day they first appeared at the booth. (IN ALAN ROSEN'S BOOK, TRUE MINT, HE RECOUNTS SUCH AN EXPERIENCE WHEN A FAMILY WALKED IN TO A CHICAGO SHOW IN ABOUT 1992-93 WITH 400 PRISTINE 1954 WILSON FRANKS CARDS. HE RELATED THAT BY THE END OF THAT SAME AFTERNOON, THEY WERE ALL GONE! WHAT A SIGNIFICANT FIND!)

    There was much intense competition for these babies, since they appeared in such stark difference to the usual creased, stained, and toned survivors of childhood past. I suppose getting one's hands on what would be considered unsold stock and to the point, a true fortunate baseball card free prize that was never damaged by either the food product, or by the typical sweaty, salty hands of an eager child recipient---would be chided by the jealous or envious as an unfair advantage. First come; first served. You would forever be grateful to the guy who told you, "did you hear that guy's got MINT Dan-Dees for sale?!?

    As you probably know, of these few unissued pristine gems that came forth from finds, only a few of those few were eventually graded TECHNICALLY PRISTINE BY THE THIRD PARTY AUTHENTICATORS A COUPLE DECADES LATER. I was an eye witness to what I have been describing. During a Chicago-area show I attended in 1976, someone walked in with said pristine 1954 Dan Dee Potato Chips---all Cleveland Indians. I won't go into details, as I'm running long at the words already. But, let us say the experience was unforgettable.

    Cheers and ciao, for now. ---Indiana Jones (Brian Powell)
  • natetrooknatetrook Posts: 613 ✭✭✭
    1954 topps Ben Wade is a hard one in psa 8...
  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>1954 topps Ben Wade is a hard one in psa 8... >>




    Definitely looks tough with a Pop of 23 and only one PSA 9 and no 10's.


    Keep them coming.





  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭
    WOW the 1954 Topps is insanely tough in a PSA 10 Gem Mint grade. Only 86 cards have achieved the grade out of 116,986 cards graded. Awesome.

    This is exactly why I wanted to start this thread. It is fun to learn about tough cards.



  • 1947 Bond Bread Jackie Robinson set of 13...

    It took Donald Spence 6 years to complete his first set...
  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>1947 Bond Bread Jackie Robinson set of 13...

    It took Donald Spence 6 years to complete his first set... >>





    Pop report



    Is the first card listed a duplicate that is mislabeled or a real card? A Pop of 1 graded would be insane with the one labeled portrait at 70 examples.


    Looks very tough with only 220 examples graded in total. Love the fact it took someone with his bank role six years to finish. Very cool.





  • mintonlyplsmintonlypls Posts: 2,228 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1962 Roger Maris #1
    0 10s
    5 9s
    1 8.5
    77 8s

    1962 Frank Robinson #350
    0 10s
    1 9
    0 8.5s
    30 8s

    1962 Willie Mays #300
    1 10
    9 9s
    1 8.5
    71 8s

    1957 Sandy Koufax
    0 10s
    9 9s
    3 8.5s
    mint_only_pls
  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭
    1981 Topps Glenn Adams has been discussed before along with 79 Topps Marc Hill both
    bears...
    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • detroitfan2detroitfan2 Posts: 3,342 ✭✭✭✭
    This is a tough set regardless of condition. A bit of an oddball set for sure:

    1953 Glendale Detroit Tigers
  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>This is a tough set regardless of condition. A bit of an oddball set for sure:

    1953 Glendale Detroit Tigers >>




    WOW most are 1's and 2's.

  • wrestlingcardkingwrestlingcardking Posts: 4,555 ✭✭✭✭
    I know DPeck will not be surprised by this but here are the stats on the Parkhurst wrestling cards

    1954 Parkhurst: no 10s, 1 PSA 9 666 graded
    1955 Parkhurst: no 10s, 0 PSA 9 834 graded
    1500 graded and just the one PSA 9 to date!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    BUYING Frank Gotch T229 Kopec
    Looking to BUY n332 1889 SF Hess cards and high grade cards from 19th century especially. "Once you have wrestled everything else in life is easy" Dan Gable
  • thehallmarkthehallmark Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭
    Feel like the old Topps 3Ds deserve a mention here, with Clemente in the front of the line.
  • SOMSOM Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭
    I'll have to see that 1962 Topps Mays PSA 10 to believe it. Incredible.

  • Beck6Beck6 Posts: 1,038 ✭✭✭
    1969 Lou Brock always beat to death or really OC
    Registry Sets:
    T222's PSA 1 or better


  • << <i>

    << <i>1947 Bond Bread Jackie Robinson set of 13...

    It took Donald Spence 6 years to complete his first set... >>





    Pop report



    Is the first card listed a duplicate that is mislabeled or a real card? A Pop of 1 graded would be insane with the one labeled portrait at 70 examples.


    Looks very tough with only 220 examples graded in total. Love the fact it took someone with his bank role six years to finish. Very cool. >>



    The first card is a mislabel. PSA doesn't grade the Bond Bread set of 48 (all different subjects), but one grader slipped up and graded one, resulting in that pop 1.

    The toughest cards are by far the Portrait Hand in the Air Variation (Pop 6), the Throwing variation (Pop 7), and the Leaping No Scoreboard variation (Pop 6).

    Only 3 known complete sets, though I will have the 4th come 2015.
  • PMKAYPMKAY Posts: 1,372 ✭✭


    << <i>I think all of these are great answers. We can all agree that there is rare and then there is condition rare.

    Both are fun to chase.

    A few months back I started a thread about the Rax Roast Beef wrestling cards. Those are extremely rare and in reality are just as rare as the Charlotte O's Cal Ripken. That said the value will never come close to that of the Ripken simply because of demand.

    Here is a scan of some raw Bundy's. I pulled these out of a box of vending singles and it is amazing how tough this card is to find in even gradable condition. There is one so far in the pop report that I submitted and I only did so because the centering was the best I had ever seen on the card. This is the type of condition sensitive rare card that would be truly a needle in a haystack if found in high grade.


    image >>



    The POP of this card is going to increase from 1 to 4 in the next few months. One is beyond bad, I just sent it in cause I needed one for my set. The other two I found later will grade 5 or 6 at best. I don't think I've seen as many raw ones as you have but I completely agree, it's ridiculously tough.
  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>1947 Bond Bread Jackie Robinson set of 13...

    It took Donald Spence 6 years to complete his first set... >>





    Pop report



    Is the first card listed a duplicate that is mislabeled or a real card? A Pop of 1 graded would be insane with the one labeled portrait at 70 examples.


    Looks very tough with only 220 examples graded in total. Love the fact it took someone with his bank role six years to finish. Very cool. >>



    The first card is a mislabel. PSA doesn't grade the Bond Bread set of 48 (all different subjects), but one grader slipped up and graded one, resulting in that pop 1.

    The toughest cards are by far the Portrait Hand in the Air Variation (Pop 6), the Throwing variation (Pop 7), and the Leaping No Scoreboard variation (Pop 6).

    Only 3 known complete sets, though I will have the 4th come 2015. >>





    Thanks for the post and congratulations on putting such a tough set together. That sounds like quite an accomplishment.
Sign In or Register to comment.