Home U.S. Coin Forum

Silver Kennedy Error On TV - UPDATED

KudbegudKudbegud Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭✭✭
The huckster was in danger of a heart attack last night. Apoplectic for almost an hour as he talked about how he stood up to the Secret Service. How they wanted them back and he said NO. How the President got a briefing about this coin and personally OK'd the right of the American Public to own this error. How the Secret Service had seized previous error coins but he has all the authentication paper work and the documentation from the government that allowed him and his 4 investors to sell these. It was crazy town for a while. I did some screen captures off their streaming feed to show here. Not the best but 5 came out view-able.

They had 500 of them, he said. Sets of the 4 silver sets coins, all 70's, with the error coin for a set of 5.

image

They did get them labeled by NGC as coming from the silver sets. But 500 sets getting by QC? All to one person? And he came to this TV sales guy and formed a partnership. A Ripply's moment? Maybe I'm just a skeptical old man. Form your own opinion. These could be on again for another frenzied hour.

As close as I could get the front and back by reversing and replaying their feed a few times, hitting print screen, then cropping the capture.

image

The NGC label that follows the rest of the 4 coin set lables

image

"You can see the top of Kennedy's head and part of his ear"

image

"Parts of the eagle"

image

Comments

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 35,844 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would only believe it if NGC swore they all came from sealed boxes of silver sets.

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • KudbegudKudbegud Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I would only believe it if NGC swore they all came from sealed boxes of silver sets. >>


    image
    The huckster swears to it and he wouldn't lie would he? NGC labeled it with their Kennedy label. I am with you though. Maybe an NGC number search would revile more info.

  • EXOJUNKIEEXOJUNKIE Posts: 1,624 ✭✭✭✭✭
    imageimage
    I'm addicted to exonumia ... it is numismatic crack!

    ANA LM

    USAF Retired — 34 years of active military service! 🇺🇸
  • KudbegudKudbegud Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭✭✭
    UPDATED INFO

    Caught the pitch from the beginning by accident while channel surfing. Hit record so I could review it again.

    Basics:
    Mint catches all Kennedy errors over the years, cancels them and contracts for someone to destroy them and not sell any. But this time he got authorization to sell this particular one. It was not said, carefully, that this was from the silver set. I will watch it again to get exactly how this is attributed.

    More to come

  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1) not an error.

    2) he is an idiot
    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    everyone wants to blame the sellers/marketers for stuff like this but the blame really lies at the feet of the collecting public.

    George Carlin said a long time ago that if you could nail together two boards like no one had ever nailed them together that some shmuck would offer you $10 for them, and he was right. so long as there is a segment of the Hobby with enough interest in this sort of thing it will be provided for purchase by someone somewhere sometime at a silly price. I suppose that at sometime in the past even our members here sold/bought these waffled coins, maybe even Fred out in Cal-I-for-ni-a. just another example of greed working well in the economic system we call Capitalism, greed from both sides of the transaction.
  • I do not consider these waffled coins to be true errors. I do not see an indication of the 'waffled error' being of silver on the cert. My guess....just more BS from these no good thieving hucksters to make one incorrectly assume it's from the set.
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've seen hundreds of thousands of these
    Mint Cancelled 'Waffled' coins.

    I don't think much of them, as they are
    obviously damaged coins or planchets.

    The ONLY reason they are 'collectable', imo, is that
    they are waffled on the floor of the U.S. Mint
    (Philadelphia & Denver only, as far as I know).
    Some collectors consider that if it's done AT the
    Mint, even after it was struck, it's a mint collector item.

    If they were waffled at the plants that make the
    planchet strips, after being returned by the Mint,
    they would not considered much of a collectable.

    They're interesting conversation pieces, worth
    a few dollars to interested collectors.

    I had one marketing company insist I procure some
    for a marketing promotion they wanted to do. I tried
    to talk them out of it, but they insisted they wanted to
    sell them.

    I've also handled the only known group of Waffled
    Martha Washington Quarters and Halves that came out
    about three years ago.

    By the way, on the vast majority of these Waffle Cancellation
    coins - I've found that 99% of them either do NOT have any
    discernible error on the coin or planchet, or it's been in the
    waffle design area, lost to the ages.

    There are a few known Presidential dollars, and a few quarters,
    found with brockages or double strikes - although you have to
    be careful about saying that a Waffle coin has a 'brockage' on it,
    from when it was minted.

    In most cases, they are just the result of another coin being partially
    on that coin when it when THRU the Waffling Machinery, and getting
    smashed together, leaving a 'brockage look' on a waffled piece.
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭
    Just another Television Salesman that lies out of his butt to try and build value for the crap he's pawning off to folks who will get the surprise of their lives when they go to sell their "treasures".

    Its a shame that those who truly KNOW about what they are selling and yet choose to fabricate LIES about it so that the uneducated will make a purchase. Its an embarrassment to the hobby and ultimately will be an embarrassment to whomever makes a purchase under those conditions.

    Why do they have to lie?

    Scum.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>everyone wants to blame the sellers/marketers for stuff like this but the blame really lies at the feet of the collecting public.

    George Carlin said a long time ago that if you could nail together two boards like no one had ever nailed them together that some shmuck would offer you $10 for them, and he was right. so long as there is a segment of the Hobby with enough interest in this sort of thing it will be provided for purchase by someone somewhere sometime at a silly price. I suppose that at sometime in the past even our members here sold/bought these waffled coins, maybe even Fred out in Cal-I-for-ni-a. just another example of greed working well in the economic system we call Capitalism, greed from both sides of the transaction. >>

    Keets, when the seller states that the "President got a briefing about this coin......." he's lying.

    Now, whose to blame?

    The seller because the "seller" is taking advantage of the over all ignorance of the general public which has been "tenderized" to the riches which have been made public within the Coin Collecting hobby. I'm thinking reports of million dollar sales and multimillion dollar sales of single coins.

    The public sucks this stuff up due to their own ignorance. All they see are dollar signs and "good fortune". 9 out of 10 of the ignorant will think that if a coin was made in 1889, then it must be worth a fortune.

    The "seller" is taking advantage of this ignorance and s/he's the one to blame for this fabrication of a story.

    I'd really like to know who this seller was.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭
    I wonder why NGC didn't put the "composition" of the waffled coin on the label? To me, that opens the door for the shysters to scam the ignorant as I have little doubt that the piece is of CnClad composition of which, none were included in the 50th Anniversary Silver Set.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Keets, when the seller states that the "President got a briefing about this coin......." he's lying.
    Now, whose to blame?.....................The public sucks this stuff up due to their own ignorance.


    Lee, you have answered your own question and affirmed my opinion no matter what the hype might be. have a nice day.
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Keets, when the seller states that the "President got a briefing about this coin......." he's lying.
    Now, whose to blame?.....................The public sucks this stuff up due to their own ignorance.


    Lee, you have answered your own question and affirmed my opinion no matter what the hype might be. have a nice day. >>

    Ahhh. So, because someone does not know any better, they deserve to be taken?

    I suppose some would entertain that position but, not me.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    as I stated above, GC analyzed and summed up the American marketplace way back in the 1970's, it was sort of like an update of "There's a sucker born every minute" from long ago. I have to explain daily what is free and it continually amazes me how lazy people are and how easily they are willing to give away their hard earned wages. the dumbing of America continues and this scam is a fine example.

    yes, if people are too stupid to investigate they probably deserve to be taken, and if a seller fraudulently advertises he deserves to be held accountable.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file