Did this '48 Leaf Wagner deserve an 8?
shagrotn77
Posts: 5,607 ✭✭✭✭
Please discuss…
"My father would womanize, he would drink. He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament. Our childhood was typical. Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring we'd make meat helmets. When we were insolent we were placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds - pretty standard really."
0
Comments
Movie line aside, I wouldn't give it an 8.
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
Successful transactions with: yankeeno7, raiderguy10, Beck6, CDsNuts, DaveP01, Dboneesq, Elemenopeo, gameusedhoop, georgebailey2, Goldlabels, gstarling, justmichael, etc
Working on.........
Tony Dorsett Master Set
1977 Topps Mexican FB (raw)
1957 Topps FB Set (raw or graded)
As far as the card goes, I know 48 Leafs are not the cleanest looking card, but that one is just dirty. I have to agree with those who said it appears that moisture got to it.
yup
<< <i>No - beside that it is FAKE. Card label and card name do not match!! >>
John (or Johannes) is Honus' actual given name. Honus is a nickname.
<< <i>I always found this card to be very interesting. Wagner had his cards pulled from the T206 due to tobacco usage among children and then the 48 Leaf shows him about to put a wad in his mouth. It's almost like Leaf wanted to defy Wagner for his earlier stance.
>>
I think that is more urban legend than anything. Wagner had his cards pulled because of a contract disagreement.
http://247wallst.com/investing/2013/04/05/tick-tock-t206-honus-wagner-going-going-gone/
Haboobs are real, and they're spectaculah!
There are lots of discussions on foxing, and when you look closely, I see foxing like spots on lots of vintage cards (usually the backs). I'm not sure I'd call this foxing... In any case, the surface is poor (dirty looking) and interestingly, I feel yellow backgrounds are esp. susceptible to this dirty surface look.
I'm sending a pocket size photo of that card along with each I card I am submitting to PSA for grading... from now on!!!
<< <i>looks like it got graded during a haboob.
Haboobs are real, and they're spectaculah! >>
HA!
I don't give it an 8 even without the browning.
How does moisture get into the card anyways......
It gets an 8 because its the rare "let me think about that" version of the card.
You can call him Honus
You can call him John
But ya doesn't have to call him Johnson.
1948-76 Topps FB Sets
FB & BB HOF Player sets
1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets
<< <i>I'm sending a pocket size photo of that card along with each I card I am submitting to PSA for grading... from now on!!! >>
+1
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." Dr. Seuss
<< <i> defense of the grade; I doubt the card looks like that in person. The CRAZY filters the guy used on the scanner bring out all of the ugly stains. >>
The card looks the same in the scan on VCP from the 2011 auction, so I don't think it's the filters.
<< <i>Yuck >>
+1
<< <i>48 Leaf gets a lot of that staining more so than most issues.
I don't give it an 8 even without the browning.
How does moisture get into the card anyways....... >>
The paper has what is called foxing. That is what turns paper this color.
I'm not familiar with the printing process of '48 Leaf cards, but I've seen plenty with possible foxing. It's possible that during the printing process the sheets came into contact with a fungi that eventually grew to what we see on this issue today. If this is a fungi, it's a good thing that it's encapsulated because it can be very contagious and spread to other paper items in someone's collection.
I'd love to read up on the history of these cards if anybody has literature or experience on them, please share.
+1 for using the word Fungi