Reviewed Type Sets in Registry. Which One ??
Fairlaneman
Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭✭
Just got back from reviewing the Registry Type Sets for Composition. After taking a Quick Look and Figuring what would be Fun and Not Extremely Expensive to Me it looks like the Set to put together would be the Copper,Nickel,Silver Set 1792 thru 1964.
0
Comments
09/07/2006
I think your choice is a good one. I enjoyed putting that set together more than all others and I learned the most.
P.S. Many of the tougher pieces from that set(including the 1792 disme) will be in the Bowers Rarities Auction at the end of July in NY.
_____________________
My Other Hobby
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
I would be astounded if you ever regretted this decision. This is a great set!
May I suggest that you "go low". Braddick has invented a new genre and there need to be more players. You talk about going lower to middle...no competition there. Why not go low and enjoy the "game". Perhaps if enough folks pay at the low end, they'll start a new set devoted to the pursuit of worn coins!
High Desert
I knew that your lurking would pay off.
The set is a great set, and you can find many nice pieces inexpensively in high circulated to low MS for most of the set, then go lower as needed when the expensive stuff creeps in. I am personally trying to find as many of these in AU-58 or better until that becomes prohibitively expensive.
(May I suggest that you "go low". Braddick has invented a new genre and there need to be more players. You talk about going lower to middle...no competition there. Why not go low and enjoy the "game". Perhaps if enough folks pay at the low end, they'll start a new set devoted to the pursuit of worn coins!)
Glad a Heavy Hitter is doing this too! I had to e-mail Rick about coin numbers for PO-1 Large Cents..... all the PCGS coin numbers are for reverse types! All the reverses are worn off on PO-1 coins..... what number do you use? ! I think Rick thinks I am crazy! But it's harder to find these super low grade coins that WILL slab, than the higher graded ones!
Mine isn't for a series set like you guys.....Mine are for a grading set.
Is PCGS really going to crack out the Sheldon book to cross reference the obverse(what's left of it).... to find out what the reverse was? (I can't tell myself) You know the graders think it will be a complete waste of time.... bag it..... saves time!
Have you guys seen the prices for the low grade coins going for on e-bay? Some sell for the price of a VF PCGS coins! It's crazy! But fun!
In God We Trust.... all others pay in Gold and Silver!
Still inclined to put a "Valley Floor" Set together Consisting of F to XF examples.
I wondered what you'd do when your Merc set is completed. I like the copper, nickel, and silver type set too, even though I'll probably never complete it. It seems like the best way to trace the history of our coinage and, to me at least, is what coin collecting is all about. I registered a set months ago that consisted mostly of coins that I've had for years. I want to add to it, but have been diverted a couple of times - first by Washingtons, and now by Mercs (2 sets that I thought I had a chance of completing).
The lack of gold doesn't bother me. The only gold coins that really do anything for me are high grade and most of them are too expensive anyway.
Have fun with this set!
Jim