Looks 62 from here. Never know, though -- pic can exaggerate as well as hide. The slide marks alone don't necessarily doom it, but it's got enough chatter besides.
the strike is bold. the luster is bright. the toning attractive. The 3 linear obverse marks probably don't appear near as bad on the actual coin as they do on the blow ups, and the reverse looks gem.
Comments
Jim
<< <i>It's MS, but those obverse scratches are going to limit the grade to MS61. >>
^^^ this^^^
"You Suck Award" - February, 2015
Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
<< <i>I'm with the MS62 group. >>
Same here ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases
the strike is bold. the luster is bright. the toning attractive. The 3 linear obverse marks probably don't appear near as bad on the actual coin as they do on the blow ups, and the reverse looks gem.
MS 63.
Dozens of BST deals completed, including: kalshacon, cucamongacoin, blu62vette, natetrook, JGNumismatics, Coinshowman, DollarAfterDollar, timbuk3, jimdimmick & many more
<< <i>I see wear, AU 58 >>
For my own knowledge I'd like to see where there is circulation on this coin?
It's a nice enough coin and the details are sharp, but the toning pattern doesn't thrill me.