What's the best Unopened Basketball Box for Shaq Rookies
rtimmer
Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭✭
Hoping for thoughts (primarily as a future investment) as to which is the best Unopened Basketball product containing a Shaq Rookie?
Follow me at LinkedIn & Instagram: @ryanscard
Join the Rookie stars on top PSA registry today:
1980-1989 Cello Packs - Rookies
Join the Rookie stars on top PSA registry today:
1980-1989 Cello Packs - Rookies
0
Comments
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
Kiss me twice.....let's party.
This from what I can remember is his best Auto'd rookie card
I had 3 of these back when this stuff came out. I want to say at the time they sold around $1500-$2000 raw of course
This was the most sought after Shaq card
Salems by the way, man, you have an opportunity out there in that previously discussed long lost thread. Haven't seen anything since. Excuse being rude on that one. But you ARE the OPC guy here it seems. You could do the 'OPC BASEBALL' wrapping on "OPC" boxes, and possibly rule it.
Wrapping a 1982 TOPPS Baseball box, in something as disturbing as 'OPC" labelled cellophane was just friggin disturbing. hahaha. Soo anti American !
Just do the OPC boxes man and I'd bet you'd win on that.
<< <i>Stadium Club Jumbo is fun, I believe there are 2 Beam Teams a box. >>
Good info....I have never seen a stadium club Jombo case do they exist out there to be able to pick up?
Join the Rookie stars on top PSA registry today:
1980-1989 Cello Packs - Rookies
Having said that - not sure that this stuff will ever be a good investment since they just plain printed too much?
That's my take.
I think the 1992 class of rookies was the best of the 1990s decade and with Shaq going into the HOF in a couple years I'm also thinking the demand for these boxes will increase.
Join the Rookie stars on top PSA registry today:
1980-1989 Cello Packs - Rookies
<< <i>It's hilarious when guys use production numbers and current supply to argue that certain unopened boxes will never appreciate. The 1981-1985 stuff, as well as things like 1989 Upper Deck, 1990 Leaf, 1992 Bowman baseball, all 1993 baseball, 1989 Score and Pro Set football, etc,. etc, etc, are not rare by any means, yet they have held and in most cases gained in value recently. Nearly any box which offers the chance at pulling Hall-of-Fame rookies and stars will see a rise in value with time. >>
I think in theory, you're correct. The problem arises when people try to correlate growth from one era (or issue) with growth from another era (or issue). Comparing early-90s anything with any issue prior is an exercise in futility. Production went way up every year, and in many years in went up a gross amount. I'm not suggesting there won't be a demand for items down the road, but to ignore the obvious production disparity would be a fool's errand.
Also the 93-94 Finest could see an increase over time. The Refractors are widely collected.
<< <i>I really like 1992-93 Fleer with the gold borders. >>
When I was still collecting basketball, I pulled this card out of a pack at the mall. Super stoked.
You basketball guys, am I wrong or what? Then again, you may wish to remain poker-faced and poker-lipped since you may also want that card and do not wish to create more competition. I might be wrong, but I doubt it. --Indiana Jones (Brian Powell)
1) Fleer was the most limited, but no upside since the wax didn't have a Shaq insert (buy the cello if choosing Fleer this year)
2) Beam Team is the key card, so TSC will always be the most popular (plus the MJ Beam Team is a sweet pull)
3) Upper Deck is the most condition sensitive, but tons of boxes still exist
4) Hoops is the best value and second hardest box to find behind the Fleer
5) Sealed cases are legitimately tough, so I would buy those for appreciation since there are some case collectors out there
Seems like every collector back then put away 2-5 boxes which is why there is a never ending supply. Very few folks could find and afford cases of the stuff so those are tough to find. The boxes are cheap enough that they make a really fun break. Last, BT inserts are about 1.25 per wax box which I didn't know until I ripped a case.
Good point, I always knew the stated 1:36 odds were wrong since some boxes had 2 and I never ripped or saw a box ripped that had none.
<< <i>Last, BT inserts are about 1.25 per wax box which I didn't know until I ripped a case.
Good point, I always knew the stated 1:36 odds were wrong since some boxes had 2 and I never ripped or saw a box ripped that had none. >>
Thanks for enlightening me on the BT inserts. I know I was merely going by the memories of the hobby hype and resulting hysteria for those cards at the time. That was truly one beautiful base set and a swell insert. Not too surprising Topps "cooked" the odds in favor of pulling more of them. If they turned out to be too rare, perhaps less cases would have been purchased in the end for the feeling of futility. Successful pulls by collectors bred more purchases. What might have started as, "I wanted to see if I can get one or a few of them", morphed to "let's see how many I can get!" Could this have been the time when some collectors began buying so much base product just to get the inserts, and then give the base away, or literally throw them away?
Back to the original question. After seeing the PSA pop report on the Stadium Club Beam Team, some of the Gem Mint pops are fairly high, and MINTs are massive in places, including and maybe especially Shaq.
Methinks you'd better invest in something else for monetary increase, but if you love Mr. O'Neal, simply collect all his first and second year cards and aim for PSA 9-10s, and the later ones with great eye appeal to YOU. Then relish your collection; it isn't always supposed to be about the future value. Like it or not, this was the era of mass production, and those were heady times for basketball.
Still, I better just shut up, 'cause I don't know basketball cards, period. ---Indiana Jones (Brian Powell)