Sent in a few for reconsideration

coinsarefun

Three submitted upgraded.




Was a MS67FB, now a MS67+FB







Was an MS63, now a MS64......not a big score but it didn't deserve to sit in a MS63 holder.







Ex: Sunnywood, ibzman350

Was a MS66, now a MS66+

BaronVonBaugh

Goldbully

Stefanie, you have quite the eye, wish I could harness that eye for myself....wonderful upgrades.

Goldbully

Double post.....glitches happen

lkeigwin

Curious...why reconsideration with a premium and not regrade with none? The usual reason is to keep the old holder if the grade doesn't change.
Lance.

coinsarefun

I wanted to keep the coins in the old holders if they didn't upgrade.
the buffalo was just tossed in because I was to lazy to write a separate order

bolivarshagnasty

Nice stuff Stef. That's great to see a plus on the '21!

Kove

<< <i>I wanted to keep the coins in the old holders if they didn't upgrade.
the buffalo was just tossed in because I was to lazy to write a separate order >>



Plus, sometimes with color it can just be safer to send them in already holdered. I've cracked out more than one coin from older PCGS holders, with good color, only to have them bag.

BustHalfBrian

<< <i>Curious...why reconsideration with a premium and not regrade with none? The usual reason is to keep the old holder if the grade doesn't change.
Lance. >>



Regrade poses the risk of losing the current grade.

Edit: Oops, nevermind. Didn't read down far enough

lasvegasteddy

sweet buff there steff

JedPlanchet

I like the nickel especially!

BustHalfBrian

Well done, btw!

Especially that 1921. You hit a nice spread.

oih82w8

Great eye to be able to pick out "upgradable" material. I would like to send a couple in but I am not sure of myself...off to post another thread.

CoinJunkie

<< <i>

<< <i>Curious...why reconsideration with a premium and not regrade with none? The usual reason is to keep the old holder if the grade doesn't change.
Lance. >>



Regrade poses the risk of losing the current grade. >>


No, it doesn't.

remumc

That Merc makes me drool.
I really like the nickle too!

Bochiman

<< <i>

<< <i>Curious...why reconsideration with a premium and not regrade with none? The usual reason is to keep the old holder if the grade doesn't change.
Lance. >>



Regrade poses the risk of losing the current grade. >>




You are incorrect in your viewpoint.
ANY submission of a coin in a PCGS holder potentially poses the risk of losing the current grade if, for some reason, the grader(s) disagree when seeing the coin.

HOWEVER, putting some really weird thing happening aside (coin really turned/spotted in the holder/active PVC ate it up/etc), a regrade DOES NOT go lower than the grade it is sent in at. HRH and DW have both addressed this many times of the years.

As Stef has said, she had old holders she didn't want to lose if the coins didn't upgrade. That is perfectly understandable.

Again, in probably 99.999999999999999999% of the cases, a regrade would not risk losing the grade at all (I can't recall one being brought to the attention of this forum since I have been on the forums)

Desert Moon

Congrats Stephanie! Your eye for quality, as usual, has not waivered.

Best, SH

fcloud

Sweet! They are all lookers! Congrats!

kaz

3 beauties and congrats on the upgrades!

BustHalfBrian

<< <i>

You are incorrect in your viewpoint.
ANY submission of a coin in a PCGS holder potentially poses the risk of losing the current grade... >>



So you are saying if I submit a coin for "reconsideration" I risk losing the grade?

EastonCollection

nice job! The coins look great and congrats with the new grades.

Catbert

Stef - were you satisfied losing the older holders for a + upgrade?