Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1989 Topps Heads Up Baseball

Please please please tell me that there were test issues and regular issues of this product? If not, I can honestly say that I threw thousands away just a couple of years ago.

Link

Comments

  • stevebaystevebay Posts: 289 ✭✭✭
    Are you sure you didn't have the 1990 version, which is more commonplace?
  • YES!!! Just looked it up. Didn't realize there were two different years that they did. Ok, I'm feeling much better. Thx!
  • IronmanfanIronmanfan Posts: 5,497 ✭✭✭✭
    Always curious why Ripken wasn't in either of these issues, although I still have the Gregg Olson one hanging on the frig in my basement.

    IMF
    Successful dealings with Wcsportscards94558, EagleEyeKid, SamsGirl214, Volver, DwayneDrain, Oaksey25, Griffins, Cardfan07, Etc.
  • baz518baz518 Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭✭
    The 1989 was the test issue for the 1990 set. Not much difference other than the copyright date and the player lineup in the set... for instance, Mark Grace was in the 1989 test issue but not the full-release 1990 issue. Which sucks, being my favorite player back in the day, I never was able to get my hands on one and have a hard time paying $150-$200 for one now.
  • bishopbishop Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭
    image
    image
    image
    Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
    Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
    Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007

    Al
  • ReggieClevelandReggieCleveland Posts: 3,818 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Doesn't the 89 Griffey get bananas prices when it sells? I got my Greenwell for a song and was over the moon about it. One of the advantages of collecting an unpopular player.
  • frankhardyfrankhardy Posts: 8,135 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have the 1989 Ozzie Smith. It was very difficult to obtain. I had to do some negotiating.....with an Ozzie Smith collector. To this day, I don't how I pulled it off. The bottom line is that I had something that he wanted just as bad, so I made a deal with him. This was probably 4 or 5 years ago. I haven't seen another one since.

    Shane

  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,783 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Doesn't the 89 Griffey get bananas prices when it sells? I got my Greenwell for a song and was over the moon about it. One of the advantages of collecting an unpopular player. >>



    Yes the Griffey sells for big money if and one comes to auction..
    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • dontippetdontippet Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭✭
    in 1990, I remember seeing the 89's at a show selling for a premium. I got real excited because I knew my local shop had a couple boxes. I made a beeline to the shop and purchased the two boxes that he had. Then, I realized that there was a difference between the 1990 boxes I just purchased and the rarer 89's.
    > [Click on this link to see my ebay listings.](https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=&amp;_in_kw=1&amp;_ex_kw=&amp;_sacat=0&amp;_udlo=&amp;_udhi=&amp;_ftrt=901&amp;_ftrv=1&amp;_sabdlo=&amp;_sabdhi=&amp;_samilow=&amp;_samihi=&amp;_sadis=15&amp;_stpos=61611&amp;_sargn=-1&saslc=1&amp;_salic=1&amp;_fss=1&amp;_fsradio=&LH_SpecificSeller=1&amp;_saslop=1&amp;_sasl=mygirlsthree3&amp;_sop=12&amp;_dmd=1&amp;_ipg=50&amp;_fosrp=1)
    >

    Successful transactions on the BST boards with rtimmer, coincoins, gerard, tincup, tjm965, MMR, mission16, dirtygoldman, AUandAG, deadmunny, thedutymon, leadoff4, Kid4HOF03, BRI2327, colebear, mcholke, rpcolettrane, rockdjrw, publius, quik, kalinefan, Allen, JackWESQ, CON40, Griffeyfan2430, blue227, Tiggs2012, ndleo, CDsNuts, ve3rules, doh, MurphDawg, tennessebanker, and gene1978.
  • bishopbishop Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭

    image
    image
    Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
    Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
    Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007

    Al
  • frankhardyfrankhardy Posts: 8,135 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hey, Al.... That looks EXACTLY like my Ozzie Smith. The resemblance is uncanny.

    Shane

  • Does the 1990 Griffey, Jr. look the same as the 1989?
  • frankhardyfrankhardy Posts: 8,135 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think it does. I am fairly sure that any players that were in both sets look the same except for the date on the back. Ozzie was only in 1989. I was being honorary with Al.

    Shane

  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Hey, Al.... That looks EXACTLY like my Ozzie Smith. The resemblance is uncanny. >>


    Looks like Ozzie needs a Kleenex.


  • << <i>

    << <i>Hey, Al.... That looks EXACTLY like my Ozzie Smith. The resemblance is uncanny. >>


    Looks like Ozzie needs a Kleenex. >>



    image
  • frankhardyfrankhardy Posts: 8,135 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I must have missed that. They are a little different. Mine is the clean nose variation.

    Shane

  • bishopbishop Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭
    Oh Oh, Shane...you need the variation to be complete image

    I have both sets and the Griffey is the same on the front in both, but different backs as someone mentioned above
    Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
    Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
    Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007

    Al
  • frankhardyfrankhardy Posts: 8,135 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Oh Oh, Shane...you need the variation to be complete image

    I have both sets and the Griffey is the same on the front in both, but different backs as someone mentioned above >>



    I wonder how SCD is going to notate this newly discovered variation? "Booger" and "No Booger"?

    Shane

  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,438 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Once again cool stuff Al - Bishop.

    You never cease to amaze with your collection.

    For those dying to have a graded Griffey? Here's one for about 2600 bucks from 4 sharp... Wow!

    image
    Mike
Sign In or Register to comment.