1952 Topps Mickey Mantle Double Print?
ClockworkAngel
Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭
So I have heard more than a few times that the Mick, Jackie, and Bobby Thomson are double printed in comparison to most of the hugh numbers. Does that mean there are double the number of Mantles out there than the rest of the set? Looking at the population report, there really isn't anything showing evidence of that. The Thomson and Robinson have been graded a few more times than the other stars, but certainly nothing to show there are significantly more out there....
The Clockwork Angel Collection...brought to you by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Chase
TheClockworkAngelCollection
TheClockworkAngelCollection
0
Comments
This is confirmed by the directional difference of the stitching on the ball on back containing the card number. These three cards can be found with the stitching either clockwise or counterclockwise.
There are also differences found on the front of the Mantle card, most noticeably in the area of the Yankees logo and name/autograph box.
Don't waste your time and fees listing on ebay before getting in touch me by PM or at gregmo32@aol.com !
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
<< <i>You always have to keep in mind that the Population report is not the best way to determine print run, as stars, rookie cards, and other valuable singles will be graded in much greater quantities than the common cards, thus, in many ways, skewing the apparent print run. >>
gregmo, that definitely makes sense, but I am looking at the Bobby Thomson and Jackie Robinson DP and expecting double the number graded. They look at about 30-50%.
I guess in 1952 "Double Print" could mean different things. It's hard to believe there are 2X the number of Mantles, Jackies, and Thomsons....
TheClockworkAngelCollection
T222's PSA 1 or better
<< <i>
gregmo, that definitely makes sense, but I am looking at the Bobby Thomson and Jackie Robinson DP and expecting double the number graded. They look at about 30-50%.
>>
Huh?
644 Robinsons graded
528 Thomsons graded
Nearly every other card in the high numbers has 250-350 graded.
<< <i>Another factor to consider with especially the Jackie is that the position on the sheet makes the centering very poor on most copies. A well centered Jackie is difficult to come by and negates the double print in my opinion >>
Agree. Rarely centered.
<< <i>you are correct. eddie was a fantastic 3b. cards are very undervalued based on his performance. >>
thats what happens when you play the majority of your career in Milwaukee (just ask Hank Aaron)
IMF
<< <i>
<< <i>
gregmo, that definitely makes sense, but I am looking at the Bobby Thomson and Jackie Robinson DP and expecting double the number graded. They look at about 30-50%.
>>
Huh?
644 Robinsons graded
528 Thomsons graded
Nearly every other card in the high numbers has 250-350 graded. >>
Compared those to the Matthews and Campanella. Two comparable stars
482 Campanella
498 Eddie Matthews
TheClockworkAngelCollection
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
gregmo, that definitely makes sense, but I am looking at the Bobby Thomson and Jackie Robinson DP and expecting double the number graded. They look at about 30-50%.
>>
Huh?
644 Robinsons graded
528 Thomsons graded
Nearly every other card in the high numbers has 250-350 graded. >>
Compared those to the Matthews and Campanella. Two comparable stars
482 Campanella
498 Eddie Matthews >>
That's true. Maybe Brooklyn Dodgers fans burned a few hundred Thomson cards because he broke their hearts.