1952 Topps Low # Set Build ERSKINE, HAUK, ROE and COMMONS ADDED

The last few months I started selling off small parts of my collection to pay for minor expenses at home. As I went through everything, I started realizing I didn't even look at a good part of my collection because I was either satisfied with the sets or didn't want to take them any further. I have purchased most of the sets or cards I wanted as a youth and felt satisfied with filling that urge. Over time, I've realized that I most enjoy set building. I also have found a love for more vintage sets based on their beauty and appeal. Ultimately, the chase of finding singles to build a set from the ground up has become my primary focus and enjoyment. I went through every set that I could part with and am selling those to fund a this new venture. Too many sets created too little focus for me.
I started 1955 Topps and 1934 Goudey set builds and have made good progress on them. However, I wanted to start one more set that posed a little more of a challenge. I've always been aware of the 1952 Topps set and it's place in the collecting world. However, I had never really dived into and truly looked at all it offered. After giving it a good amount of time and research, I started to see why it has been so appealing to many collectors. I've always loved the Topps run from 1952-1956 and that is why I intially picked 1955 to start. However, most every card can be had in good condition at any given time and the set somewhat blends together with the same profiles on every card.
The 1952 set offers many different poses, colors, backgrounds, profiles (horizontal) and I love the blend of actual photos with some artist enhancement. I was looking to do a 1953 set build but found it was a little too much on the "painting" side. If you want to say I'm drinking the Kool-Aid, so be it, but I do see a "mystique" in the 1952 set when I look at it.
The obvious issue with collecting this set are the High Numbers and the Mantle card. I decided that just completing the Low Numbers would be very satisfying and a basic starting place. In other sets, I have always collected about any card that would fill a hole in the checklist. But, I saw some good points from other board members over time that a set is much more appealing with consistent condition and centering on the set. I agree with that and the 1952's look much better when they are centered nicely. I am not a high net worth collector, so I am targeting lower grade raw cards (G-VG/EX) that have good centering and nice overall appeal for the grade. I am not going for all the red & black backs/variations/etc. at this time. As long as it has a different number on the back, that is fine with me. If that changes with time, so be it. For now, we'll just start slow.
Enough talk, here is the beginning. I absolutely LOVE this card and the image. I am looking to have the star cards graded and a little nicer quality. I think I got it with this one....

Some raws that I picked up that I thought were a good price



I have more coming in the next couple days and will put them up. Thanks for looking!
I started 1955 Topps and 1934 Goudey set builds and have made good progress on them. However, I wanted to start one more set that posed a little more of a challenge. I've always been aware of the 1952 Topps set and it's place in the collecting world. However, I had never really dived into and truly looked at all it offered. After giving it a good amount of time and research, I started to see why it has been so appealing to many collectors. I've always loved the Topps run from 1952-1956 and that is why I intially picked 1955 to start. However, most every card can be had in good condition at any given time and the set somewhat blends together with the same profiles on every card.
The 1952 set offers many different poses, colors, backgrounds, profiles (horizontal) and I love the blend of actual photos with some artist enhancement. I was looking to do a 1953 set build but found it was a little too much on the "painting" side. If you want to say I'm drinking the Kool-Aid, so be it, but I do see a "mystique" in the 1952 set when I look at it.
The obvious issue with collecting this set are the High Numbers and the Mantle card. I decided that just completing the Low Numbers would be very satisfying and a basic starting place. In other sets, I have always collected about any card that would fill a hole in the checklist. But, I saw some good points from other board members over time that a set is much more appealing with consistent condition and centering on the set. I agree with that and the 1952's look much better when they are centered nicely. I am not a high net worth collector, so I am targeting lower grade raw cards (G-VG/EX) that have good centering and nice overall appeal for the grade. I am not going for all the red & black backs/variations/etc. at this time. As long as it has a different number on the back, that is fine with me. If that changes with time, so be it. For now, we'll just start slow.
Enough talk, here is the beginning. I absolutely LOVE this card and the image. I am looking to have the star cards graded and a little nicer quality. I think I got it with this one....

Some raws that I picked up that I thought were a good price



I have more coming in the next couple days and will put them up. Thanks for looking!
Currently collecting PSA graded:
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
0
Comments
hit me up on a pm. would love to see them go to a good home ....
my 52 topps run
Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona.
-George F. Will
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
Great set and a lot of fun put together.
collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started
Currently collecting 1934 Butterfinger, 1969 Nabisco, 1991 Topps Desert Shield (in PSA 9 or 10), and 1990 Donruss Learning Series (in PSA 10).
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
Two very nice cards. Best of luck moving forward.
The Mize is one of my Top 10 favorite images in the entire set. It is very slightly tilted, but very clean and nice. Haven't seen a couple of these semi's come up very often in auction format.
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
<< <i>The set is really growing on me as time goes by >>
Funny, I felt the same way when I first started putting together this set in autographed form. Was never one of my favorite sets back in the day, but I really like this set now. One of my favorites!
Very nice additions ... I enjoy watching you make progress on this set.
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
Keep us updated. Best of luck!
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
Thank you for posting your cards.
Unfortunately, the costs of life are requiring a bit of a break from this particular set build. Hopefully I can pick it up again this summer or fall. It has really been a great set to work on.
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
For Sale