What would you pick for a modern auto RC: PSA or BGS
bounce
Posts: 1,094 ✭✭✭
Been doing some searching lately for some rookie auto and patch/auto cards.
Have noticed that there are many more BGS 9.5s available than there are PSA 10s or even PSA 9s.
Since I buy them already graded and don't play the submission game, just wondering why this is?
Is it because BGS also gives an autograph grade, or is there some other reason?
I've also noticed that on a lot of them, the BGS 9.5 sells for more than the PSA 10, although this isn't always true. Again, wondering why?
Maybe this has been discussed before, but I don't remember it if it was. Would like to hear some opinions.
Have noticed that there are many more BGS 9.5s available than there are PSA 10s or even PSA 9s.
Since I buy them already graded and don't play the submission game, just wondering why this is?
Is it because BGS also gives an autograph grade, or is there some other reason?
I've also noticed that on a lot of them, the BGS 9.5 sells for more than the PSA 10, although this isn't always true. Again, wondering why?
Maybe this has been discussed before, but I don't remember it if it was. Would like to hear some opinions.
0
Comments
most of my modern FB Autos are BGS. that wasn't by design, i was just hunting for the best price
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
I would stick with BGS for refractor auto cards. PSA for everything else.
Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona.
-George F. Will
<< <i>I stick and stay with PSA and when I stray it is with SGC. I just have never been a BGS fan >>
Pretty much me right there the last year or so.
<< <i>I have been wondering as well, both with regards to auto and non-auto, for modern FB. Thanks to all for the input. >>
agree and please keep it coming folks - want to better understand what people think about and look for on the modern autographed RCs
I'm also chasing a fair bit of these in FB and noticing a TON more in BGS holders than PSA, wondering why that is - I can't imagine it's just the auto grade as there are plenty of 10 auto grades that shouldn't be, which says to me it's sort of irrelevant thing UNLESS it's less than a 10
Exactly. An auto less than a 10 is unacceptable to the OCD population. Miguel Cabrera is probably my starting point for when to consider BGS. Anything before Cabrera I prefer PSA.
Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona.
-George F. Will
Why are there more BGS'? Thats what the kids collect. Also, its much easier to submit to BGS (no membership needed)
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
<< <i>Not even close, Those Back Pages. >>
How so?
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
Modern = BGS
Vintage = PSA
Pre-War = SGC
That could have a little to do with it.
<< <i>I am not a "kid". Neither are most collectors who trust BGS for their collection of nonvintage sports cards. >>
"Kid" to me is any one under 40 years of age
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
Unfortunately I agree.
<< <i>"Kid" to me is any one under 40 years of age >>
What do consider to be over the hill then? 111? Stay well guys.
<< <i>If you ask any forum what grading company is best, the general consensus is:
Modern = BGS
Vintage = PSA
Pre-War = SGC
>>
And is this because the perceived card grade accuracy is "better" at each for these items?
I have to admit, I see plenty of PSA 10s that don't look "GEM MINT" to me, but I haven't seen too many BGS 9.5s that I felt the same way about. I'm obviously excluding BGS 10 Pristine, but mainly because there are so few in the first place.