Regrades are cracked out when received, the old serial number is (eventually) deleted from the cert database, the pop numbers are (eventually) updated.
The coins are assigned new numbers and then sent through the grading room just like raw coins......... only they're guaranteed not to grade lower. If for some reason they do grade lower, the grade guarantee kicks in.
The coin isn't necessarily a problem in a 66 holder, unless the prospective buyer sees the previous auction result before bidding (LOL). I posted this more to illustrate how one can work the system to great advantage if they really know the grading game. Or one can pay a lot more for their coins if they don't check auction history before bidding. No shame at all on the flipper/re-submitter; it's an upper-deck home run.
In fact, this coin looks every bit of 66 to me (from images, anyway), and with exceptional eye appeal. I think the combination of outrageous target toning and Registry grade made this coin into an instant celebrity, whereas it may not have gotten the benefit of the Registry effect in a 65 holder.
Maybe the submitter asked PCGS to lose the provenance, thereby making it a bit harder to determine that the second auction coin was the same as the first. That is what I would do.
I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
Of course a regrade can keep the provenance. Who cares though if it says Teich on it. My "guess" is that the only way to get a truly fresh look at this coin was to send it in raw, and give up Teich, which is giving up nothing as far as I am concerned.
<< <i>Maybe the submitter asked PCGS to lose the provenance, thereby making it a bit harder to determine that the second auction coin was the same as the first. That is what I would do. >>
This ^^^
Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
Comments
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
A reliable thing.
Encouraging for investment in coins.
Just curious...cause it makes a difference.
<< <i>How do you know it was a crackout and not regrading?
Just curious...cause it makes a difference. >>
This is either an answer to your question....or an invitation to teach me something new. Not sure....
But does a "regrade" get a whole new serial number? Or do they reholder it with the old number?
That is also a possibility is it not?
So why would this coin be a problem in a 66 holder if it really is a 66?
Just curious...
Btw, I don't own the coin and don't know who does...just as a disclaimer
The coins are assigned new numbers and then sent through the grading room just like raw coins......... only they're guaranteed not to grade lower. If for some reason they do grade lower, the grade guarantee kicks in.
In fact, this coin looks every bit of 66 to me (from images, anyway), and with exceptional eye appeal. I think the combination of outrageous target toning and Registry grade made this coin into an instant celebrity, whereas it may not have gotten the benefit of the Registry effect in a 65 holder.
<< <i>How do you know it was a crackout and not regrading?
Just curious...cause it makes a difference. >>
Wouldn't a regrade have kept the provenance?
Lance.
Of course a regrade can keep the provenance. Who cares though if it says Teich on it. My "guess" is that the only way to get a truly fresh look at this coin was to send it in raw, and give up Teich, which is giving up nothing as far as I am concerned.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
<< <i>Maybe the submitter asked PCGS to lose the provenance, thereby making it a bit harder to determine that the second auction coin was the same as the first. That is what I would do. >>
This ^^^
We all play "the game" everytime we buy a slabbed coin. Like it or not. I like it.
My 1866 Philly Mint Set