'58 Topps Mick PSA NM 7 for comparison....your example matches up better, but i'm curious about the way the side borders are cut. good luck if you send it in for grading.
Are you guys suggesting it would come back miscut because of the slight diamond cut? Unless there's a special strict grading standard for Mantles, no way. I've seen countless PSA 8s with this kind of diamond cut. They just aren't very strict about tilt and diamond cut.
No, Im saying mis cut not because of the centering. But because the top and bottom boarders are flat and flush to the 90 degree black frame. But the left and right boarders are miscut giving the corners angles greater or less than 90 degrees.
Comments
<< <i>I would say 6 >>
probably a pretty safe bet - corners look nicer than a lot of 6s but there appears to be some edge wear on the right side
PSA HOF Baseball Postwar Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 80.51% Complete)
PSA Pro Football HOF Rookie Players Set Registry- (Currently 19.80% Complete)
PSA Basketball HOF Players Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 6.02% Complete)
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
<< <i>SHARP Surface! Wonder how much they'll deduct for the diamond cut >>
+1. That was a big issue for me. Can't see that in a 7.
<< <i>I would say 6 >>
+1, though it does appear there may be an indentation to the right of the Yankees logo. If so, 4.5?
<< <i>Miscut PSA >>
Are you guys suggesting it would come back miscut because of the slight diamond cut? Unless there's a special strict grading standard for Mantles, no way. I've seen countless PSA 8s with this kind of diamond cut. They just aren't very strict about tilt and diamond cut.
Im saying mis cut not because of the centering.
But because the top and bottom boarders are flat and flush to the 90 degree black frame. But the left and right boarders are miscut giving the corners angles greater or less than 90 degrees.