Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Tool for judging low pop?

I've been thinking about how to identify cards in a set that are low pop. With small sets you can kind of eyeball it, but with something like 1972 Baseball it's tougher.

It would be cool if you could load the pop data into a spreadsheet, compile, say, the number of >= 9s for each card, and then rank the cards on a percentile basis. So it would tell you, e.g., Bob Barton is in the 15th percentile....15 percent of the set has a smaller number of 9/10s.

Then you could use this data together with anecdotal evidence to try and determine where "low pop" kicks in. 20th percentile? 10th?

I don't have the spreadsheet expertise to do this, but I'm sure someone does.

Comments

  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,742 ✭✭✭✭✭
    First you're designing your baseball cards with bizarre stats on back, now you want to design a resource tool for low pops, what's next? World Peace?? LOL..


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • PaulMaulPaulMaul Posts: 4,891 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Next I plan to end pack re-sealing and eliminate shilling on eBay. Stay tuned!
  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Next I plan to end pack re-sealing and eliminate shilling on eBay. Stay tuned! >>


    I'd set my sights a little lower, go for world peace first image
  • 70ToppsFanatic70ToppsFanatic Posts: 2,106 ✭✭✭✭
    You CAN cut and paste the pop report into a spreadsheet
    and then just sort on the column for the grade level of interest

    I've done it many times.


    Dave
  • PaulMaulPaulMaul Posts: 4,891 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>You CAN cut and paste the pop report into a spreadsheet
    and then just sort on the column for the grade level of interest

    I've done it many times. >>



    I guess just sorting on the combined 9/10 population would paint a pretty good picture. I think a percentile ranking would be nice, but I guess that could be easily obtained by just normalizing by the set size. I.e. For 1972 once you've sorted, you would just generate a column for (787 - rank + 1)/787. Does that sound right?

  • 70ToppsFanatic70ToppsFanatic Posts: 2,106 ✭✭✭✭
    I've done several variations on some years to determine things like
    relative scarcity within the set itself across all grades, versus other years,
    at the same grade levels, etc.

    I've used the results for both slabbed card evaluation, and also as input to unopened
    product valuation and comparison.

    The possibilities are almost limitless.


    Dave
  • mrpeanut39mrpeanut39 Posts: 841 ✭✭✭
    I like to sort by total graded. The low pops are what they are, but I think this adds another facet. Chances are the well known low pops are getting cracked out so the total graded will go up. I think you can find some unsung low pops using total graded.
    "I think the guy must be practicing voodoo or something. Check out his eyes. Rico's crazier than a peach orchard sow." -- Whitey Herzog, Spring Training 1973
Sign In or Register to comment.