Why does PSA use 1956 as a cutoff for specials?
BaltimoreYankee
Posts: 3,034 ✭✭✭✭✭
For example, I often see "1956 to present". I would think 1957 to present would be more logical as 1956 cards were the last of the larger size.
Daniel
0
Comments
Odd balls are present enough in both the before and after 1956 groups. The grading standards are tougher for 1956 and newer though. Take a look at pre war cards if you weren't aware; for a random example, a 1908 PSA 7 might be very lucky to get a 5 if it were graded by the same standards as if it were issued in 1975.
<< <i>Odd balls are present enough in both the before and after 1956 groups. The grading standards are tougher for 1956 and newer though. Take a look at pre war cards if you weren't aware; for a random example, a 1908 PSA 7 might be very lucky to get a 5 if it were graded by the same standards as if it were issued in 1975. >>
When I asked the question some time ago I was given a somewhat lengthy explanation. The way 1955 Bowman and 1954 Dan Dee cards are graded were given as part of the explanation. Obviously the way prewar cards are graded is a whole other ballgame.
<< <i>Size doesn't matter >>
That's NOT what she said
Michael Scott's evil twin Matt
Current obsession, all things Topps 1969 - 1972