Gem? I think it has a great shot!
tsalems1
Posts: 3,449 ✭✭✭✭
1981 Harold Baines OPC rookie card. This is NOT the Gray back version which is a pop 1 and there is something fishy on that gray back!
This card is a pop 7 in PSA 9 with no 10's. For those that are familiar with O-Pee-Chee, know how difficult centering is and with 1981's in particular.
I think this will be the first PSA 10...
This card is a pop 7 in PSA 9 with no 10's. For those that are familiar with O-Pee-Chee, know how difficult centering is and with 1981's in particular.
I think this will be the first PSA 10...
opcbaseball.com
0
Comments
Jimmy
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
<< <i>Is the dot to the lower right of his nose on the card? >>
I prety sure that dot is on all of them....
<< <i>
<< <i>Is the dot to the lower right of his nose on the card? >>
I prety sure that dot is on all of them.... >>
I guess that goes for the one on the collar too as the 8 has it. I'd like to see a PSA 10 to see if the dots are there or not.
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
<< <i>Bottom right corner, maybe?? >>
The corners on this card are FANTASTIC. 10x loope shows perfect corners
<< <i>Gray back PSA 10 >>
Awesome! Good luck with the sub.
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
Beautiful looking card ... best of luck with your submission.
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
Knowing OPC baseball grading, I think it has as decent a shot as any at getting a 10. If it were mine and it came back a 9, I'd resub at least once. The scan makes it look to me like there was a hint of a small touch on the lower right corner but you confirmed with your later post that under the 10x loupe that the corners are sharp so I'll trust that over my eyes here. My bet is that if it were sent to BGS, it would get a 9.5 Gem Mint and not a 10 Pristine. Not really relevant, because I don't really use BGS and I'm pretty sure you don't either. I have no trouble seeing that in a PSA 10 holder in my opinion.
<< <i>Gray back PSA 10 >>
Wow those are smooth edges for an OPC
Jmaciu's Collection
Bosox1976
collecting 1977 topps baseball in psa 9 and psa 10
Yours is nice hope you get the 10..
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
Good luck with the sub and let us know how it turns out.
GEM MINT 10 1981 O-Pee-Chee 347 Harold Baines Card
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
Pop 1 Rookie (cream colour back)
Looks like I blew up the pop report in PSA 9..lol
I will send PSA the labels and hope they correct it
WTG!!!
Bosox1976
Congrats on the pop!
Do you have a set in the Registry?
Jmaciu's Collection
This also illustrates how fine a difference there is between a high end 9 and a 10--that is with the exception of monetary value, of course, lol..
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
+1
I normally give up after 2 tries. I can see why you'd keep after this one because if any card deserves a 10 it was this one.
Congrats on the 10 and the perseverance. I always just settle for whatever I get.
<< <i>Tom, that's awesome!! Gives me more motivation to send some in for review. Let me ask, did u crack out and submit or just send it for review? >>
Crackouts - I need to send the old labels in so the Pop report can get fixed