Guess the grade - Football HOF rookies
DezHood
Posts: 145 ✭
Just got these cards back from PSA graded. Please guess the grades and post your analysis behind it. i'd appreciate it. Thanks.
0
Comments
"Common sense is the best distributed commodity in the world, for every man is convinced that he is well supplied with it"
PSA 7 MC or N9-trimmed on the Upshaw
Upshaw - 6
<< <i>Hannah - 4
Upshaw - 6 >>
agree
Upshaw 6
Eugene 6
Upshaw: PSA 5 (or rejected for miscut)
I will say 5
The Upshaw looks like a "7", but is OC or MC
BTW: Cubby=Cub Fan
6
5.5
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>Maybe a couple of 4's.. WTH would you grade those? >>
I was thinking the same thing. The corners and centering just kill that Hannah.
Upshaw 5 centering not great on both sides also
Also with a positive suggestion to Mr Dezhood
Post cards before you send in and ask advice.
If you put all the responses together you can get an idea of what you have.
I hope the cards you sent in are for sentimental reasons as you may lose $ on your sub.
1948-76 Topps FB Sets
FB & BB HOF Player sets
1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets
1954:
4 on both of them
This was correct because they count as 4s.
otwcards:
Hannah: PSA 6 OC
Upshaw: PSA 5 (or rejected for miscut)
I like this answer because it had one exact and the other close and I agree with analysis - cut looks bad.
Actual:
Hannah: PSA 6 OC
Upshaw: PSA 6 ST
<< Maybe a couple of 4's.. WTH would you grade those? >>
I was thinking the same thing. The corners and centering just kill that Hannah.
I graded them for this set: Team 75 Years
In all honesty, I'm running out of steam a little bit on the set (I'm going to finish it and then sell most of it). I bought the cards on COMC - thought they looked like 5s and as you can see 5s fit my collection (my eye did find a PSA 6 Mackey rookie and PSA 7 Matt Snell rookie in same sub - all 4 COMC cards were cheap). And the Hannah is one of those cards - big pain to find without a lot of surface snow on his hair/forehead so I was ok with this one - the set does have centering issues. The Upshaw is crazy - I hadn't looked at the image in forever because I had the card in hand - with the really white borders and decent corners I never noticed it looks trimmed! I doubt it though probably just MC. This is my second card (Earl Campbell rookie) with a random "ST". Anyone see it? I have good vision and a cheap magnifying glass - I don't see anything. Could it be they meant "MC"?
Thanks for replies - this was fun - I used a website called "Minus" to post the images - pretty cool.
<< <i>The Upshaw is crazy - I hadn't looked at the image in forever because I had the card in hand - with the really white borders and decent corners I never noticed it looks trimmed! I doubt it though probably just MC. This is my second card (Earl Campbell rookie) with a random "ST". Anyone see it? I have good vision and a cheap magnifying glass - I don't see anything. Could it be they meant "MC"? >>
Tiny bit of ST in the right side yellow border? Doesn't seem like enough to get a qualifier. Is there wax residue on front that's not visible in the scan? FWIW, I was going to guess 5OC & 6OC.
<< <i>
<< <i>The Upshaw is crazy - I hadn't looked at the image in forever because I had the card in hand - with the really white borders and decent corners I never noticed it looks trimmed! I doubt it though probably just MC. This is my second card (Earl Campbell rookie) with a random "ST". Anyone see it? I have good vision and a cheap magnifying glass - I don't see anything. Could it be they meant "MC"? >>
Tiny bit of ST in the right side yellow border? Doesn't seem like enough to get a qualifier. Is there wax residue on front that's not visible in the scan? FWIW, I was going to guess 5OC & 6OC. >>
I saw that little mark on the right side, but I agree doesn't seem like much - most cards have something like that. Wax residue... I thought same - under magnification I do see a faint circle between his left hand and the ground - so I wondered about that. I wish for "MK" and "ST" they would provide an explanation.
<< <i>BTW, nice Bronko Chicle and looks like a fun set to put together! I'll see if I have any spares of the 72/74s you still need. >>
Thanks - the Nags will always be the highlight of my collection. After looking at lots of beat up 2s, to make a deal on a 3 I liked really felt good.
Definitely PM me if you have anything I need. The Ray Guy doesn't come around much and when it does it auctions well. I'm guessing with the HOF induction demand is greater than supply right now.