Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1972 Topps Dan McGinn variation

1966CUDA1966CUDA Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
What are the odds that Topps would change their designation on this card like they did on a few of the 1973 Topps cards with the gaps in the borders. Check out the missing ink at the top of this one!! Both variations come up on ebay and I dont see where PSA lists the variation at this time.

image
Link to my auctions

Comments

  • PMKAYPMKAY Posts: 1,372 ✭✭
    The missing ink on the left card can be found all over the card on the right.
  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,783 ✭✭✭
    Not a chance PSA recognizes this...
    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • PaulMaulPaulMaul Posts: 4,891 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Not a chance PSA recognizes this... >>



    Let's hope not...this kind of "variation" doesn't do much for me.
    My 1972 Baseball and Wacky Pack Registry Sets
  • bishopbishop Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭
    The McGinn is a fairly easy to find recurring print defect. As far as recognition, it is not dramatic but if PSA can recognize an errant green smudge in the baseball on the back of the 1961 Fairly as a variation, anything is possible.. And it is no less a"varition" than the 58 Herrer, the 57 Bakep, or the 52 Campos
    Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
    Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
    Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007

    Al
Sign In or Register to comment.