Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Some poppage...PIC'S ADDED!

Just got 3 cards back from SGC. New holders are nice and they are doing their grading a bit different.

1. 1972 Kellogg's Greats Babe Ruth Mint 9
2. 1972 Kellogg's Pete Rose VG 3.5
3. 2012 Topps Tribute Bob Feller Blue 23/199 NM/MT 8.5

I put these into SGC holders because the blue background of the cards looks great with their black border holder.

Comments

  • wrestlingcardkingwrestlingcardking Posts: 4,555 ✭✭✭✭
    i'd like to see the scans!
    BUYING Frank Gotch T229 Kopec
    Looking to BUY n332 1889 SF Hess cards and high grade cards from 19th century especially. "Once you have wrestled everything else in life is easy" Dan Gable
  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Was the Rose what you expected or was there something you missed?
  • lightningboylightningboy Posts: 1,483 ✭✭✭
    How is their grading different?
  • GuruGuru Posts: 3,127


    << <i>Was the Rose what you expected or was there something you missed? >>



    Yeah, I expected the Rose to be that low. The only reason I had it put in a holder was because it looks good with the black borders.

    They grading hasn't changed, should have specified that. But they are now putting number grades on from 1-10 with half grades as well. They are still using their old system, but they just add this I think to avoid confusion.
  • bobbyw8469bobbyw8469 Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Was the Rose what you expected or was there something you missed? >>



    Yeah, I expected the Rose to be that low. The only reason I had it put in a holder was because it looks good with the black borders.

    They grading hasn't changed, should have specified that. But they are now putting number grades on from 1-10 with half grades as well. They are still using their old system, but they just add this I think to avoid confusion. >>



    SGC has been doing that for years.
  • GuruGuru Posts: 3,127


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Was the Rose what you expected or was there something you missed? >>



    Yeah, I expected the Rose to be that low. The only reason I had it put in a holder was because it looks good with the black borders.

    They grading hasn't changed, should have specified that. But they are now putting number grades on from 1-10 with half grades as well. They are still using their old system, but they just add this I think to avoid confusion. >>



    SGC has been doing that for years. >>



    I guess I just hadn't noticed. Sorry.
  • RipublicaninMassRipublicaninMass Posts: 10,051 ✭✭✭
    Scans would be great! Are you saying the no longer are using the sgc 10-100 scale, JUST the number grade?

    ok I see the scans. if the change the flips again, planning to reholder?
  • GuruGuru Posts: 3,127
    Here you go!

    image
  • lawnmowermanlawnmowerman Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭
    When did SGC change their flips? I no likey.
  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>When did SGC change their flips? I no likey. >>


    +1, either of the two older styles are preferable.
  • hockeycrazyhockeycrazy Posts: 309 ✭✭
    Agree. Flips actually look cheesey ; nice cards though...
  • jmaciujmaciu Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭
    Chris, the Rose presents very nicely for the grade!
  • GriffinsGriffins Posts: 6,076 ✭✭✭
    there was a huge backlash to the flips and they are going to use new ones that look more like the old ones.
    These are the soon to be scarce interim flips.

    Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's

  • addicted2ebayaddicted2ebay Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>there was a huge backlash to the flips and they are going to use new ones that look more like the old ones.
    These are the soon to be scarce interim flips. >>



    That flip makes me want to kick my dog.
  • GuruGuru Posts: 3,127


    << <i>Chris, the Rose presents very nicely for the grade! >>



    Thx John!
  • ldfergldferg Posts: 6,744 ✭✭✭
    What is turnaround time? I'm thinking of using them as well given the increase at PSA and backlog. I do like the black background.


    Thanks,

    David (LD_Ferg)



    1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
  • GuruGuru Posts: 3,127
    This one was the May monthly special which was 20 day turnaround. However, they had it in 15 and then mailed it 2 days ago. No offense to PSA, because they are the leader in the graded card market, but the turnaround time is just brutal.
Sign In or Register to comment.