What am I missing here?? Is this Joe Morgan rookie REALLY a '7'??
bobbyw8469
Posts: 7,139 ✭✭✭
..or did someone switch the card out?
0
Comments
~WalterSobchak
PSA HOF Baseball Postwar Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 80.51% Complete)
PSA Pro Football HOF Rookie Players Set Registry- (Currently 19.80% Complete)
PSA Basketball HOF Players Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 6.02% Complete)
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
Easily noticeable tilt? Check
Fading/discoloration where the player's names are? Check.
PSA 5. Chaz.
Dodgers collection scans | Brett Butler registry | 1978 Dodgers - straight 9s, homie
This is mine...this is typical of what a '7' looks like.....I cant see the sides of the PSA case, but I am thinking someone HAD to have switched that card out. No way could PSA miss a card that obvious!! It looks like a '4' to me.
~WalterSobchak
<< <i>Did you make this threat to bash PSA and show off your pretty SGC? >>
Uh...lookie boys and girls...a new alt/troll.......
I for one am full supporter of PSA....last year, I spent $5,000+ with them. SGC got around $500. Just wanted opinions about a '4' in a '7' holder. Thinking it HAS to be switched out. If PSA totally missed that one, well, that is pretty bad......
No, I am not an alt but you can call me a troll all you like. I just find your actions a bit curious.
You seem to be very paranoid, Bobbyw8469
<< <i>You seem to be very paranoid, Bobbyw8469 >>
Yes...I'm paranoid....I love seeing people break open cases and switch out cards! Is that what you do for a living?
<< <i>
<< <i>You seem to be very paranoid, Bobbyw8469 >>
Yes...I'm paranoid....I love seeing people break open cases and switch out cards! Is that what you do for a living? >>
OH! You caught me! Nice going, Sherlock!
Don't waste your time and fees listing on ebay before getting in touch me by PM or at gregmo32@aol.com !
I think that it is much more likely a mech error than it is a case of someone switching the card. There have been a few well-documented mech errors on the grade, not just the other parts of the label, in other threads. It can happen even though it is rare.
Probably just a mistake on the grading, or was graded on the 4SC grading scale.
it definitely doesn't compare to this one
<< <i>the card is pretty weak but it is not a 4. the crappy 2X scan is magnifying the corner wear. the card probably should be a 6 due to the corners. as for the tilt, that is a non issue , the card probably measures 60/40 at worse at all points. >>
If only factoring centering and corners, maybe a 6, but Fading/discoloration where the player's names are? Check. should get it a PD qualifier or maybe a straight 5.