If you had to pick: Tom Seaver or Bob Gibson
SUNTZ
Posts: 35 ✭✭
Hi gang, I'm interested in starting a single player collection. I've narrowed it down to two of my favorites but don't know which one to choose. I'm torn between Tom Seaver and Bob Gibson and looking for pros and cons on both. If you had a choice which player would you choose as far as cards, graphs and memorabilia go. Which player do you think would be a better investment ? Any guidance would be appreciated, Thanks!!!
0
Comments
<< <i>Seaver is probably the better choice, IMHO. More markets if you ever decide to sell including New York. >>
Agreed.
who are Seaver collectors.
That being said, it's also hard to discount Bob Gibson. He was one of the most dominating pitchers in baseball from his early days,
and even later when the mound was lowered 6 inches.
Both of their RCs in PSA 8 cost about the same, though Gibson's earlier cards tend to be a bit more costly than Seaver's in equal grade
so you might be making a slightly steep investment in a Gibson collection (other than if you are chasing a 1969 Seaver PSA 9 which will
set you back a lot more than a 1960 Gibson PSA 9).
You cant go wrong with either of them IMO.
Dave
<< <i> >>
+1, my all-time favorite player as well!!!
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep."
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans."
Collecting:
Any unopened Baseball cello and rack packs and boxes from the 1970's and early 1980s.
Off the field, I have read about Gibson being quite surly with fans and collectors. Just gives off a bad vibe, while Seaver has been a good guy off the field.
For my money, it's Seaver, but I'm big on collecting guys that are good people and I gracious to their fans off the field
TheClockworkAngelCollection
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
There's at least 10 great Gibson card's to own.
When I think of Seaver, he has maybe five cards I'd want to own.
I would choose Gibson simply because his stuff is a more interesting challenge to find. His RC is a tough high number in a 1950s set. If you ever look for game used stuff (the real thing, not pieces of cloth pasted to a card) it's much harder to find than Seaver stuff, and his autograph, especially on vintage items is harder to find (lot of ghost signed and clubhouse stuff). Then there is also his brief career as a Harlem Globetrotter.
People are going to look back on that 1.12 ERA in 1968 and compare it to Dimaggio's hitting streak, a record that may never be broken.
<< <i>Gibson. Better looking cards (1960s) and older vintage cards to collect.
There's at least 10 great Gibson card's to own.
I have a lot of trouble warming up to that Pink 59 Gibson RC. Both great pitchers but Seaver gets my vote
Gibson spent his whole career with one team, and his cards span from 1959 to 1975
as far as CARD collecting, have to go with Gibby
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
<< <i>Seaver is the greatest Met of all time, not even close. But he was on three other teams. no bueno. his cards span from 1967 to 1987
Gibson spent his whole career with one team, and his cards span from 1959 to 1975
as far as CARD collecting, have to go with Gibby >>
I was gong to say Seaver then I read this very valid point.
<< <i>As great as Seaver was, not really sure whether to consider him a Met or a Red. >>
I disagree. Tom Seaver is without question considered to be a New York Met more often than he is considered to be a Cincinnati Red.
Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007
Al