Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Any Red Sox buffs here? Jacoby Ellbury fans

This is my first time posting over here. I have been on the currency side as a lurker for years and a poster more recently. I have a good red sox baseball I am considering selling. Its the ball in play of Jacoby Ellesbury's first stolen base. It is signed and noted "first stolen base 7/2/07. It is all certified with a certificate from Steiner. The ball has a hologram sticker. 100% legit. I bought it at Fenway park and paid big big money.
If you guys want pictures I can take them and I will post them. I just wanted to see if A-there was interest and B- if we had any red sox fans who would care about this baseball.
My pm is on if anyone needs to use it.

Comments

  • Probably needed to sell it last year to a Red Sox fan. Now you are looking for a Yankee fan!

    Nice ball btw.

    -Jason
  • Lol you have a point.
    However, Jacoby Ellsbury will always remain a part of Red Sox nation. A few championships under his belt to support it. I would also like to mention that 2007 was another world series year for the sox if you had not thought of it.
  • flatfoot816flatfoot816 Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭
    as an ardent Sox fan--I disagree that he will remain a part of Red Sox Nation--

    once you sign with the Yankees--IMO--you are out forever. Clemens, Boggs, Sparky Lyle--gone gone gone

    good luck with the sale however

    Go Sox-----don't go Jacoby!!!!
  • You cannot change history. The fact that he was part of the red sox franchise when they won 3 world series cannot be changed. He will always be a part of red sox nation. Maybe not in the future but in the past. His future history will be with the Yankees I agree with that. Say what you want but you cannot be bitter.
  • scooter729scooter729 Posts: 1,730 ✭✭✭
    Just to straighten out one point - Ellsbury was here for the '07 and 2013 titles, and not for 2004, so he was part of two titles.
  • BaltimoreYankeeBaltimoreYankee Posts: 3,034 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice ball. BaltimoreYankee used to dislike Ellsbury image
    Daniel
  • pandrewspandrews Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭
    my girlfriend is a Red Sox fan.. she had a Ellsbury jersey she wore for years..

    she burned it to ashes when he signed with the Yankees..
    ·p_A·
  • mattyc_collectionmattyc_collection Posts: 2,130 ✭✭✭✭✭
    On an admittedly tangential note, sometimes I wonder why some fans (in all sports) seem to hate their team's rivals more than they love their own team. I believe one can root for his/her team with passion, but still stop far short of being consumed with a burning hatred for their team's rivals.

    That type of hate is negative energy to carry within oneself. It can also manifest in senseless brawls among fellow Americans who would otherwise help each other in a true crisis. As much as sports can be unifying for fans of the same team, we must all temper that enthusiasm so it does not become too divisive. Indeed it is a good thing to remember that beyond being countrymen, Yankee and Red Sox fans both love baseball image

    Instagram: mattyc_collection

  • doog71doog71 Posts: 405 ✭✭


    << <i>Very nice ball. BaltimoreYankee used to dislike Ellsbury image >>



    Me too! All of a sudden I feel quite an affinity for him.

    That's a lot of Red Sox hate for Ellsbury, but I'm surprised a guy who was so integral to such a great Red Sox WS run would be that despised.
  • FavreFan1971FavreFan1971 Posts: 3,103 ✭✭✭
    Insert Favre to Vikings comment here.
  • he will be patrolling hallowed ground... like Babe, Johnny and others, he is now forgiven.
    plus he's a mainstay on my keeper league fantasy team...
  • yankeeno7yankeeno7 Posts: 9,248 ✭✭✭
    Maybe Jonny Gomes would be interested in it
  • zep33zep33 Posts: 6,897 ✭✭✭
    That is a cool ball. He did a bunch of signings with BC Sports after the 2007 season. He was the hot rookie for them back then. Wish the store here on the Cape was still around. Used to earn points in the store by buying cards that could be used to get their signed stuff. I sure bought a lot of cards in 07/08 there image


    I have a nice, matted 16x20 photo that he signed in November 07 and a ball (sold it after he signed with the Yankees) that were also from a BC Sports signing.
  • I dont think there is hate for him. He spent some of his best years with the sox. I am sure some people squak about his going to the Yanks but we are used to seeing them take our sloppy seconds.


  • << <i>I dont think there is hate for him. He spent some of his best years with the sox. I am sure some people squak about his going to the Yanks but we are used to seeing them take our sloppy seconds. >>



    He cleaned up good. Keep em comin'
  • mattyc_collectionmattyc_collection Posts: 2,130 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, the whole Bambino thing was a serving of sloppy seconds I would take over and over again.

    Instagram: mattyc_collection

  • I purchased this ball in 2008. It is signed and noted by Jacoby Ellsbury. He wrose on the ball "1st stolen base". I have all the COA including Steiner and the MLB # Hologram. Somebody from this forum was interested but I am now very soured. I paid good money for this ball. The interested party sent me a pm tonight and stated "he paid $80 for a Jeter game used ball and would never pay more than that for a generic ball".
    Am I mistaken???
    Did I pay big money for a generic ball?
    I am sorry but I just cant accept that.
    This is the ball in play when he stole his first base then when on to score a home run on a wild pitch from 2nd. Is this a generic ball guys?
  • mattyc_collectionmattyc_collection Posts: 2,130 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Why would you be soured because of one random guy's opinion, especially someone who was possibly trying to acquire it, and who would thus have every interest in trying to get the price down? If you own an item in your collect and enjoy it, there's no need to let its worth be either enhanced or decreased by the opinions of others.

    If you are seeking to sell it, then the best way to find out what it's worth is to place it up for sale in a venue where it will be seen by as many eyeballs as possible; that's the only way to really find out if one paid a good price. But if this was an item owned and enjoyed for years, that needs to be considered when selling; that was value gotten from the piece.

    When selling cards or collectibles, I personally look at breaking even as a great thing, and anything atop that is gravy.

    On a tangential note, it seems to me that so many "collectors" seem so hung up in what a piece is "worth" on any given day, as opposed to taking great enjoyment and pride in an item's beauty or rarity or superior quality. Of course, no one wants to lose money upon selling, but then if that's the sole goal, one needs to stick exclusively to the real "blue chip" high-demand or extremely rare items, be they 52 Mantles, eye-appealing (accurately graded) popular HOFer RCs, etc. The farther one strays from such items, the more one knows, going in, that they risk their initial outlay.

    Instagram: mattyc_collection

  • lawnmowermanlawnmowerman Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>This is the ball in play when he stole his first base then when on to score a home run on a wild pitch from 2nd. >>



    I would say the ball is worth way more than $80. I would hold out for top dollar.

    Hitting a home run from 2nd base is a feat in itself and clearly has never been done by anyone else in the history of MLB.
  • akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
    Guys, I'm the guilty party who shared my concern for the balls MLB authentic ID# that simply states the ball as being game used on that date. It is not documented to an actual play.

    I've purchased several game used balls from MLB stadiums where the MLB ID states the actual play the ball originated from, whether it be a foul ball or hit.

    Thus my opinion that the balls significance can't really be tied to Ellsburys stolen base play.
    It is unfortunate if the owner was told otherwise.

    Just for comparison i brought up my Jeter hit ball, the MLB ID shows who pitched and what inning Jeter hit it.

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • Its clearly written on the ball "first stolen base" written by Ellsbury. The certificate also supports it. Initially the person who contacted me showed great interest. Next thing I know I am being told its just a game used ball. Being compared to one of Derek Jeters balls that was picked up for $80. I paid a lot of money for this ball. I am also willing to sell it at a loss. I just dont appreciate being talked into a value of $80.00. I would let it go for half of what I paid or less.. But $80?
    Can you really buy a Derek Jeter base hit ball with COA to support it for that price? At Yankee stadium nonetheless??
    This person told me the ball "lacks provenance" and is "generic".
    So this is one of the 3 COA's that came with the ball. Doesnt it support the hand written inscription by Ellsbury? Is it really generic? Or is someone trying to hose me?
    image
  • akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
    With due respect please stop private messaging me regarding the ball.

    This will be my final statement on the thread regarding the matter.
    I had only inquired once about the ball, but you continued to send me over 10 more PM's over a 2 week span offering me a lower sale price (I never responded until I finally got fed up and called the scenario out).

    Scenario being:
    Game used balls from MLB do have specific plays documented in reference to the MLB ID #. No one can confirm any such play (let alone Ellsbury's stolen base play) because your MLB ID # states that it was just "game used" on that date.

    Perhaps it was an error on MLB's part regarding the ball's provenance.
    Or could it be that your COA issuer purchased a mass amount of game used balls from that game and had Ellsbury sign them with "first stolen base".

    Yes, i've purchased game used hit balls, foul balls etc at ballparks in the $40-$80 range, one being a Jeter hit from years ago at Safeco field.

    Take care.

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
    It's clearly spelled out in your document shown in the photo "Game used" on July 2nd 2007. Which play in the game was it used?

    Post your MLB ID # and go to this website:

    http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/authentication/

    MLB even states that it was "game used" on that date. However no specific play referenced.

    Believe me MLB does indicate if a ball was used in a specific play and it would be stated in the reference website.

    You asked for it and now I just want it to be known so no one else gets mislead into believing it was used in Ellsbury's first stolen base play. Which your price tag supports.

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
    You've wasted my time enough with the private messages:

    Here is my response to your latest PM:

    Your ball is honestly not worth more than $80 for it's provenance of game used. The signature itself is worth a hundred or two? so to be fair yes $200-300 range would be fitting.

    I don't believe you are understanding that the ball was not tied to an actual play.

    If someone who had a game used ball from Mark McGwire's 500th homerun game, could they pass it off as THE home run ball? and markup the price? Absolutely not.

    Do yourself a favor and educate yourself on these subjects before mouthing off. It's fairly transparent based on your thread that you have no clue.

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
    MLB ID #: 558088 BB

    Hologram number BB558088 was located in the MLB Authentication Database under BALLS.
    Session Product Description: GAME USED BALL
    Session Name: TEXAS RANGERS @ BOSTON RED SOX
    Session Date: July 02, 2007
    Autographer:
    Authenticator: AUTHENTICATORS, INC.

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
    Can someone tell me how you block a CU member from contacting you?

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • The only reason I ever PM'ed you was in response to your initial contact where you wrote-

     Mar/17/2014 12:10 AMHi there, 

    I'm a big Ellsbury fan. 
    He played ball at my alma mater Oregon State. 

    He's also an Oregonian like myself. 

    Curious what you paid for the ball and what you're looking to sell it for? 

    And yes I'm a big Red Sox fan. 

    Martin 

    I contacted you a couple of times when I dropped the price to let you know because you showed interest. You did not respond to a couple of pm's as the price got lower and then you responded with-


     Mar/25/2014 10:49 PMI have a Derek Jeter game used hit ball that I obtained at Safeco field for $80. 
    Not to rain on your parade but I'd never pay more for a generic game used ball. 

    Good luck on the sale. 

    I had no desire to bring your name out to the forum with your attempt to devalue my item. I never did. You did. It appears that now you somehow want to make it appear as though I have wronged you. Sorry but I know better then to let someone talk me into selling my stuff for to cheap. So its up to you if you have more to say about this. I really dont.

  • akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
    The ball wasnt used in Ellsbury's stolen base play as you stated in your first post to this thread.
    Just let that fact be known, but i'm sure CU members are wise enough to know this already.

    Good luck on your sale.

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,743 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This thread went south quickly. Was your purpose initially to share the ball with the board as a part of your collection or to pitch it for sale? If the latter, you should have just listed it for sale on the correct forum and left it at that. As DM stated, I don't know why you'd be "soured" just because someone offered you a price at less than what you thought it was worth. It's certainly not something I would air out in the open like this, in any case.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • So I believe that this is your attempt to devalue my item and prevent another person from buying it because you couldnt convince me to sell it to you for $80 like all the other game used Jeter autographed balls you have bought.
    If you really want to support your statement about this not being Ellsbury's 1st stolen base game used ball I think you would either need to produce another ball with the same inscription or somehow prove that the COA's are fake.
    I think that $450 for this ball is more than fair and for some reason you seem hell bent on wanting to see it devalued to your impression of value. Dont you have something more constructive to do?
  • IronmanfanIronmanfan Posts: 5,497 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The ball wasnt used in Ellsbury's stolen base play as you stated in your first post to this thread.
    Just let that fact be known, but i'm sure CU members are wise enough to know this already.

    Good luck on your sale. >>



    count me in as among those that knew this from the beginning

    IMF
    Successful dealings with Wcsportscards94558, EagleEyeKid, SamsGirl214, Volver, DwayneDrain, Oaksey25, Griffins, Cardfan07, Etc.


  • << <i>This thread went south quickly. Was your purpose initially to share the ball with the board as a part of your collection or to pitch it for sale? If the latter, you should have just listed it for sale on the correct forum and left it at that. As DM stated, I don't know why you'd be "soured" just because someone offered you a price at less than what you thought it was worth. It's certainly not something I would air out in the open like this, in any case. >>


    Im sorry. I believe your right. I am kind of new to this forum and what you said makes sense.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    Don't know how much it's worth but based on my interpretation of the COAs, it is a 7/2/07 game used ball but *not* the ball in play for Ellbury's stolen base.

    From what I can tell with a quick google search, they go through around 70 balls per game (HRs and/or fouls into the stands, over scuffed, pitched into the dirt, etc).
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • EchoCanyonEchoCanyon Posts: 2,288 ✭✭✭
    How do you make a forum poll?

    I want to do a poll to see if I should chime in or not.
  • zep33zep33 Posts: 6,897 ✭✭✭
    Ellsbury himself probably has the real ball from his first stolen base. He was known for his speed long before his debut. His first stolen base of what was/is expected to be many, many more was a very big deal. The hype surrounding his debut and his speed is still fresh to me. Chances of BC Sports ending up with that very ball - slim to none.

    I agree with others stating that the ball you have is just a ball from the game he stole his first base with. Still an awesome ball though.
  • EchoCanyonEchoCanyon Posts: 2,288 ✭✭✭
    Someone needs to tell me why the ball hit at the time of a SB would matter?

    That's like trying to selling a base from someone's first HR....
Sign In or Register to comment.