20th century silver type set comosition - Basic set - ***UPDATED LIST***

condorcollectibles

This is the checklist I made for a PCGS 20th century modern silver type set Im working on (1901-2000; gem ms white only; no varieties). Per the original post, here is the updated set composition:

5c - Jefferson -Type 2 (war issued)- (FS)
10c - Mercury Head - Type - (FB)
10c - Roosevelt - Type 1 - (FB)
25c - SLQ - Type 1 (no stars below eagle) - (FH)
25c - SLQ - Type 2a (stars below eagle; pedestal date) - (FH)
25c - SLQ - Type 2b (stars below eagle; recessed date) - (FH)
25c - Washington - Type 1
25c - Washington - Type 4 (bi-centennial)
50c - Walking Liberty - Type
50c - Franklin - Type - (FB}
50c - Kennedy - Type 1
50c - Kennedy - Type 4 (bi-centennial)
50c - Kennedy - Type 2 (SMS)
50c - Commemorative - Type
$1 - Peace - Type 1 (high relief)
$1 - Peace - Type 2 (low relief)
$1 - Eisenhower - Type 2
$1 - Eisenhower - Type 4 (bi-centennial)
$1 - Commemorative - Type
$1 - Silver Eagle - Type
$0 - Non denominated Commemorative - Type

Total Coins - 21

pocketpiececommems

Would a 90% State quarter type be included?

cointime

Well, if you're starting with 1901.....
Barber series
1948-1963 Franklin
Morgan$

condorcollectibles

<< <i>Would a 90% State quarter type be included? >>



Thanks for posting! I think the silvers were proof only, I would have to check for a mint state .............

condorcollectibles

<< <i>Well, if you're starting with 1901.....
Barber series
1948-1963 Franklin
Morgan$ >>



Good eye cointime! I had the franklin on my original list but did not list it here (oops) ........ As with the others, the barbers and morgan, they will be included in my 19th century set as their "first mintage" was pre 20th century. As is, with this set I am including only those coins whose first mintage was post 1900 ............... Thanks again for catching the franklin omission

cointime

Condor,

That makes perfect sense.

bestmr

I'd be game for this to be a registry set.

condorcollectibles

<< <i>I'd be game for this to be a registry set. >>



Same here! Definetly a fun set to build as it includes several of my favorites. When I went to register the set I was surprised to see that it wasn't in the registry along with the other centuries as well as golds. As is, I was happy to include it in the showcase since Im doing it as a "educational" set as opposed to a competitive set ........ Gonna make the set public as soon as I acquire a few more pieces. Looks like the real challenge for me is going to be finding the SLQ's in 65FH (all white) since this is a gem-white collection ........