Sub results: K, K, K, K, hit by pitch, ejected, error
![Mickey71](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/userpics/021/nKNDPIJ4YFMK8.jpg)
I was not pleased. If anyone know's 62 football....the Brown is not a 6. The leaf Williams' color and print quality are impeccable. 60 Kubek....expensive 8-no dice, 71 Rose...7 because it's not a 9, 69 WL...you're joking, 65 Rose....not funny, 59 Phillies...expensive 8-no dice. What's going on???
In case the question comes up....I did not cheap out. Williams/express sub, others/reg....not bulk.
![image](http://i59.tinypic.com/sm35z5.jpg)
![image](http://i62.tinypic.com/2r3h6aq.jpg)
![image](http://i59.tinypic.com/ji1cmx.jpg)
![image](http://i58.tinypic.com/2cyrww1.jpg)
![image](http://i62.tinypic.com/im802q.jpg)
![image](http://i59.tinypic.com/301k12t.jpg)
![image](http://i60.tinypic.com/v4ryc2.jpg)
![image](http://i59.tinypic.com/29oqtfn.jpg)
Now remember...these scans are very oversized
In case the question comes up....I did not cheap out. Williams/express sub, others/reg....not bulk.
![image](http://i59.tinypic.com/sm35z5.jpg)
![image](http://i62.tinypic.com/2r3h6aq.jpg)
![image](http://i59.tinypic.com/ji1cmx.jpg)
![image](http://i58.tinypic.com/2cyrww1.jpg)
![image](http://i62.tinypic.com/im802q.jpg)
![image](http://i59.tinypic.com/301k12t.jpg)
![image](http://i60.tinypic.com/v4ryc2.jpg)
![image](http://i59.tinypic.com/29oqtfn.jpg)
Now remember...these scans are very oversized
0
Comments
Does that 71 rose have an indent on his batting hand? Looks almost like a fingernail indentation.
PSA HOF Baseball Postwar Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 80.51% Complete)
PSA Pro Football HOF Rookie Players Set Registry- (Currently 19.80% Complete)
PSA Basketball HOF Players Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 6.02% Complete)
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
That is a common print mark on like all 71 Roses.
Bummer grades - sharp cards.
Bosox1976
In case get kicked off for my view its been a nice run.
<< <i>That rose has to have a wrinkle on it or something to get a 5. >>
Yup. There is no possible way that card could be a 5 otherwise. The card in the scan looks like a 7.5 or an 8.
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
All look nicer but the 65 Rose must have some type of wrinkle or something.
The Leaf Willams does have great color but I would agree with that grade even with the very large scan. There is too much corner wear for a 7 and it also does have some very light surface wear.
How come the Williams card does not fill the holder? Is this a size issue with the 48 Leaf for the Psa holders?
aconte
edited ---> I changed my mind. Maybe that Leaf could be a 7.
All of those cards are very, very nice for their grade. If I am being honest I think all of these cards are graded correctly though. The Williams card has the best potential for a successful review. The white letter card got a PSA 6 because of it being out of focus and not because of the centering or corners. The Brown has too much chipping to be in a PSA 8 holder and perhaps could be considered for a PSA 7- centering is spot on with that card. The Phillies card is a tough card in high grade and your card has four touched corners-bottom right has a small line from being dinged. Overall the cards are incredible but I would think you might have one bone thrown your way.
Shane
<< <i>
<< <i>That rose has to have a wrinkle on it or something to get a 5. >>
Yup. There is no possible way that card could be a 5 otherwise. The card in the scan looks like a 7.5 or an 8. >>
There appears to be either a surface crease or wrinkle starting at the white border, just below the pennant, upwards and slightly to the right.
edited to add pic:
The others looked like 6-7's and they fell in that range. As other pointed out the Rose looked to have a wrinkle which explains the 5.
Nice cards though and great scans.
saucywombat@hotmail.com
Am I the only one who sees very strange looking left borders on the Parker and 65 Rose?
Also, Parker has bad registration. That probably dropped it at least one grade.
Edited.
CDsNuts, 1/9/15
<< <i>I'm I the only one who sees very strange looking left borders on the Parker and 65 Rose? >>
I noticed it as well, but think it's a vending box like 'curl' to the cards where they wouldn't lay perfectly flat. There shouldn't be any grade deduction for that though.
~WalterSobchak
<< <i>I'm I the only one who sees very strange looking left borders on the Parker and 65 Rose? >>
no. i was gonna mention it, but i think Danny's taken enough abuse already. sometimes a card will take on that appearance because of a slight warp while otherwise being very crisp.
my 2 centavos.
<< <i>The Brown in a 6 holder for 62 FB is a complete joke. >>
Does the Brown have some spider creases in the lower right corner area?
I had the same grader with my most recent order. It was my first submission in a long time, and I filled it with high grade, strong condition cards. I got hammered. I felt all but two cards were lower than they "could" have been, and at least half were egregious errors.
Don't waste your time and fees listing on ebay before getting in touch me by PM or at gregmo32@aol.com !