Just asking' Can a case be made for Reggie Smith for the HOF?
KalineFan
Posts: 868
I'm just asking because I just remember he had a pretty potent bat with the Sox in the 60's
and he seemed to hit very well in the clutch.
Tony
KalineFan
and he seemed to hit very well in the clutch.
Tony
KalineFan
0
Comments
He's an incredible hitting coach for kids here in LA. Really patient and very giving, a great guy from all accounts.
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
Fred Lynn (959)
Shawn Green (945)
Brian Giles (925)
Bobby Bonilla (924)
Ellis Burks (912)
Raul Ibanez (907)
Derrek Lee (906)
Del Ennis (905)
Paul O'Neill (904)
Jermaine Dye (902)
A lot of good players, but no HOFers.
bobsbbcards SGC Registry Sets
Steve
<< <i>I think I'd vote for Al Oliver before ever thinking about Reggie Smith.
Steve >>
Reggie Smith had an OPS+ of 137 for his career. Oliver exceeded that once. OTOH, Oliver's career was about 20% longer. Neither would be the worst player in the HOF. I prefer Smith.
<< <i>agreed. Some good years with the Sox and the Dodgers, but far from HOF.
He's an incredible hitting coach for kids here in LA. Really patient and very giving, a great guy from all accounts. >>
That's great to hear. We loved him as kids in Boston. But cannot imagine Reggie, Fred Lynn or Ellis Burks in HOF.
Used to working on HOF SS Baseballs--Now just '67 Sox Stickers and anything Boston related.
Used to working on HOF SS Baseballs--Now just '67 Sox Stickers and anything Boston related.
<< <i>I think I'd vote for Al Oliver before ever thinking about Reggie Smith.
Steve >>
+1
He did have 45 HR's in Japan to wrap up his career.
CDsNuts, 1/9/15
Not to hijack the thread, but is there a name(s) that commonly comes up in support of that statement? Purely curious.
<< <i>Neither would be the worst player in the HOF
Not to hijack the thread, but is there a name(s) that commonly comes up in support of that statement? Purely curious. >>
George "High Pockets" Kelly for worst HOF'er seems to be the one I've heard most often. Rick Ferrell another. As for Reggie, I'd say no to the HOF. But there were a couple of seasons with the Dodgers where he was the best player on that particular team, though Steve Garvey got the pub. Smith would make a Hall of Very Good
His OPS+ numbers are better than a LOT of HOFers. Reggie's down side was he only had 8051 PA.
The two guys that are in the hall that had lower OPS+ and similar times at the plate are Orlando Cepeda and our favorite guy to argue about Jim Rice, both of whom had more plate appearances.
Most of the HOFers that had a lower OPS+ number than Reggie had 10,000 PA.
He had a pretty darn good final year, anyone know why he retired after his one (very good) year with the Giants?
Thank you for that - I can't recall ever having a conversation about, or hearing of an obviously poor candidate. Some quick research shows that Kelly was shooed in by some friends on the Veteran's Committee, never having received more than 5 votes as a player. As far as Rick Ferrell, I think there is a viable case to be made for him being there legitimately.
To compare to modern times, George Kelly's induction would be tantamount to seeing a player like Marquis Grissom or BJ Surhoff enter the Hall. I think we'd all scream "foul" as well.
Reggie Smith was certainly a consistent force on the Red Sox and Dodgers for many years, but so long as we are going to make a case for those that should be in, let's start with Alan Trammell and Jack Morris.
<< <i>VERY underrated player!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
His OPS+ numbers are better than a LOT of HOFers. Reggie's down side was he only had 8051 PA.
The two guys that are in the hall that had lower OPS+ and similar times at the plate are Orlando Cepeda and our favorite guy to argue about Jim Rice, both of whom had more plate appearances.
Most of the HOFers that had a lower OPS+ number than Reggie had 10,000 PA.
He had a pretty darn good final year, anyone know why he retired after his one (very good) year with the Giants? >>
Went to Japan for the 83 & 84 seasons. I don't recall the particulars at the time though.
<< <i>Neither would be the worst player in the HOF
Not to hijack the thread, but is there a name(s) that commonly comes up in support of that statement? Purely curious. >>
http://thecanonreview.blogspot.com/2010/12/worst-of-best-baseball-hall-of-fames.html
<< <i>
<< <i>VERY underrated player!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
His OPS+ numbers are better than a LOT of HOFers. Reggie's down side was he only had 8051 PA.
The two guys that are in the hall that had lower OPS+ and similar times at the plate are Orlando Cepeda and our favorite guy to argue about Jim Rice, both of whom had more plate appearances.
Most of the HOFers that had a lower OPS+ number than Reggie had 10,000 PA.
He had a pretty darn good final year, anyone know why he retired after his one (very good) year with the Giants? >>
Went to Japan for the 83 & 84 seasons. I don't recall the particulars at the time though. >>
If he went to Japan it was probably because they offered a better contract. Two more years in MLB gets him to 19 years of service and around 9,000 PA.
I wonder if he then gets some support? Of course he would need those last two years to be productive.
Reggie Smith BR Bullpen page
CDsNuts, 1/9/15
Reggie Smith