Options
Another 1971 OPC Card: Seaver
jmaciu
Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭
I just picked this 1971 "Canadian" Seaver card up last week. Alright OPC fans, What PSA grade should I expect?
Any input and critique is welcome. I am thinking PSA 7.
Any input and critique is welcome. I am thinking PSA 7.
0
Comments
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep."
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans."
Collecting:
Any unopened Baseball cello and rack packs and boxes from the 1970's and early 1980s.
<< <i>I don't know what it will get, but I'm metsmorized by it.
Jmaciu's Collection
I don't think it has a shot at an 8
Email: OPCBASEBALL@YAHOO.COM
Follow OPCBASEBALL.COM on Facebook
<< <i>Top left corner doesn't bother you, Tom? >>
Yes it does. I still think it could 7 though. Getting a good read on the true condition of 1971 opc baseball is very difficult with scans.
No doubt the top left is a problem but hard to tell if the rest of the card is problem free.
From the backside scan, the bottom left may be a issue as well, just hard to tell.
It may be a 6
Email: OPCBASEBALL@YAHOO.COM
Follow OPCBASEBALL.COM on Facebook
I'm with Tom on this one. I was going to say 6.5 before I read his posts. I've got some 1971 OPC cards that came back 7 but looked a little nicer than that one, though I felt that those were a little low for the grade. Certainly the particular grader you get plays into it, and strictly comparing to the graded 1971 OPC's I have, I think a 6.5 is appropriate, but if it were mine, I would consider a 7 as a possibility, though a pleasant surprise. Either way, nice card, good luck!
Jmaciu's Collection
TheClockworkAngelCollection
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>I have a difficult time distinguishing between the rough cut and a flaw on 1971 OPC. Why is the upper left corner different? >>
EOT.
CDsNuts, 1/9/15
<< <i>I'm with Tom on this one. I was going to say 6.5 before I read his posts.
Chance at a 7.5...
>>
Come on guys, let's be honest - this card has a better shot at getting a PSA 10 than pulling a half grade. We all know those are reserved for review submissions
Jeff
I'll guess 7.
Good point on the half grade, can't believe how seldom they give them out.
<< <i>I haven't graded '71 OPCs but I would say it has a shot at an 8 depending on how the corner looks under a loupe. The rough cut can hide a bit of wear. It's frankly hard to distinguish whether the upper left corner is worn or just showing white from the rough cutting process. >>
This is my first that I am going to submit. I scoped the card with a 10X magnifier, and while it appears that the upper left effect is from the rough-cut procedure, it is really hard to say. I really don't know what to completely expect here. I do have a PSA 7 1971 OPC Bench that does have some wear on both lower corners.
Jmaciu's Collection
<< <i>Here's a Seaver PSA 6 that I own. I apologize for the scan, shoulda bought the Epson.
Sharp card! The ding halfway down right edge is probably the reason it only graded a 6.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
Jmaciu's Collection
bobsbbcards SGC Registry Sets
<< <i>Wow, I forgot to update this. The first submission yielded a PSA 5 grade. The card was cracked out and submitted a second time, and that time it graded a PSA 7. I will try to post a scan later today or tomorrow of the card in the holder. >>
PSA 7 is the grade it deserved. Cingrats, John!
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
Jmaciu's Collection
Jeff