Opinions wanted
perkdog
Posts: 30,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Sports Talk
Im a firm believer that the Safety that happened right into the game was done on purpose.
I seriously think some friend or relative of the Denver Center had a huge prop bet on a Safety and he was in on it to garantee the Win on the prop bet.
You guys agree or disagree? Ofcourse I cant prove this but Im curious if anyone else thinks like I do on this.
This has nothing to do with the game itself, Seattle won fair and square and is the better team.
I seriously think some friend or relative of the Denver Center had a huge prop bet on a Safety and he was in on it to garantee the Win on the prop bet.
You guys agree or disagree? Ofcourse I cant prove this but Im curious if anyone else thinks like I do on this.
This has nothing to do with the game itself, Seattle won fair and square and is the better team.
0
Comments
m
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
That said, the play resulting in a safety was bizarre. Who knows why it happened.
All I know is my favorite team laid an egg. It was as if Denver had no mental toughness at all and just wanted to be somewhere else. Seattle likely would have won the game if Denver played well, but it seems like Denver did not care and barely even tried. No fire in Denver's belly.
I bet the NFL never wants to see Denver go back to the Super Bowl again.
Seems incredibly unlikely to me.
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
<< <i>Im a firm believer that the Safety that happened right into the game was done on purpose.
I seriously think some friend or relative of the Denver Center had a huge prop bet on a Safety and he was in on it to garantee the Win on the prop bet.[./q]
So you're presuming the guy would risk his NFL career for his bet, and you're also presuming that they would know that Denver would have had the ball first and backed up in their own endzone.
1. A player making over $1m per year would have to agree to essentially throw the game, risk his career, and possibly his life as a free man for 5-10 years.
2. The bet has to be made not knowing who is going to get the ball first.
3. The team has to start close enough to its own goal line so that the snap can even approach the end zone.
4. Most casinos do not accept unusual betting action. To make the risk worth it, the bet would have to be in the $50k-$100k range. No casino will accept that wager.
There was no way to guarantee a safety with a bad snap. There was just as much chance of a defensive touchdown happening.
Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"
I guess Im just looking into it to much ( or not enough ) but a Safety in that situation is just so unacceptable.
That stadium was LOUD yesterday when Denver had the ball. For a second, I thought the game was in Seattle, LOL..
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
It really should have been easy money around here. You guys suck, for not helping him out.
<< <i>I'm pretty sure Perk started this thread on a bet ... $50 if he could get 1 person to join in on the conspiracy theory within an hour.
It really should have been easy money around here. You guys suck, for not helping him out. >>
Actually Mike, Im all set for any action that has to do with the NFL for now.
I lost 3 $100 Squares last night, I had GREAT Numbers but that Safety really ruined my chances.