Enough for a 62PL or go back to sleep? :)

morgansforever

The obverse, full blown DMPL no doubt, the reverse right there at the edge of PL. Yes there's chatter all over the obverse, the DMPL surfaces heighten it. I'm tellin ya the reverse is so close. Only thing left is to submit. The 62 examples I've viewed look worse than mine. What's your opinion?

EDIT: The more I look at the rims, the more doubt I have. At least I don't have much in it.

blu62vette

That reverse doesnt show me much PL. Sorry....

morbidsteve

<< <i>That reverse doesnt show me much PL. Sorry.... >>

Unknown

This content has been removed.

coindeuce

Your coin is a 8TF VAM 10 (A1e reverse). There are very few VAM 10's that PCGS or NGC have ever given a PL designation to. There only a handful (fewer than 6) of certified VAM 10 known with Prooflike designation. I've owned at least 12 high grade examples of VAM 10 in my collecting career; none of them had a technically prooflike reverse, many had a PL obverse and only one had a DMPL obverse.
Conversely, the 8TF VAM 15 which shares same A1e reverse as VAM 10, is often seen fully PL on both sides. I have a VAM 15 in NGC-65DPL in my collection which I believe is graded and designated properly.