Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Help with ebay......

I'm trying to put together a '69 topps bb set after picking up a nice lot at a card show. I go on ebay and begin to look around - thought I'd start with Reggie. Now, yes, there are very many fine examples with excellent scans - much, much better than the old days - when there weren't even photos. But still, I just can't figure some of these sellers out.

This card is offered for $80 BIN. Granted it's a nice big iphone photo, but what can I tell from this? Why do sellers do this? How could someone buy this with only this photo? There's no description of the card, nothing, just the photo.
image

This person starts the bidding at $50. Seems reasonable...or is it? I can't zoom in and the card is on some kind of weird angle that makes the top two corners impossible to see. It looks like it's worth $50 but how much higher would I go? I don't know, I can't tell! Yes, I suppose I could email him and ask for a better scan, but I'm too lazy for that and there's too many other ones out there. I also can't help but wonder if people do this to hide something. Again, no description.
image

Then I run across a lot of 148 cards said to be in vg/ex condition for $75. The seller offers one photo of 9 cards that you can zoom in on but that's it! No listing of the numbers and no other scans. I do still need a bunch of commons - why doesn't the seller list the numbers contained in the lot? For $75 can't I get a list of the numbers?

Have many of you felt this frustration? Scared to pull the trigger because of poor information in a listing? There are, thankfully, many really good sellers out there. I've been very satisfied with the cards I've actually purchased, and many sellers really do a good job with scans and descriptions. I'd like to take this moment to thank you and let you know your efforts will pay off!

Comments

  • Unfortunately, some sellers don't know what people want and list what they think is needed. Others know what people want and deliberately hide or ignore key facts. It's not always possible to find out which is the case.
  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As you've stated, with the 69 Topps BB, there are plenty of sellers out there with good scans & descriptions so just ignore the others. On some other sets, I've had to request additional pics/scans and/or a list of cards in a lot. Most sellers I've done this with have responded pretty promptly, those that haven't I just move on and don't worry about it with high BIN or starting bid. If it's a 99 cent starting auction, this is where you can get some really cheap hits if you're willing to gamble.

    Some sellers do this in the rush to take advantage of free listings (I remember some sellers listing only a title, no pic and description only said 'I'm taking advantage of free listing day. Pics/description coming soon."), laziness, lack of knowledge, or some combination. I can say from personal experience selling that the auctions I've taken the time to fully describe every detail about a card have brought more than the one's I've just included front/back scans of a card and a generic cookie cutter description, but time-wise I could crank through a lot more listings in a short period with just the scans.
  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How about this pic/description:

    Link
  • Indy78Indy78 Posts: 806 ✭✭✭
    Your examples demonstrate the precise reasons I don't look anymore for raw lots or singles on eBay when building near mint or better sets. Nine times out of ten, when I've done so, I've been disappointed. I'm fortunate to live in an area with at least one card show per month with sellers that have nice raw from the 70's (my focused era). Therefore, 95 percent of what I buy on eBay is PSA cards for my registry set or PSA-graded stars for my raw sets that I crack out. All of the commons come from card shows. It's rarely the cheapest way to build a near mint or better raw set, and it tends take much longer to complete a set than buying lots on eBay, but it saves me the grief of dealing with the described situation. I also think that in the context of search time, it ends of being a more efficient way of building sets (in other words, I'm not spending hours and hours each week pouring through listings looking for raw lots).
Sign In or Register to comment.