Thanks!

Manorcourtman

This 1829 was attributed O-109 by NGC. It has all the tell tall signs of an O-109 but has the A's filled in like a 109a. It has zero reverse die cracks like the O-109a. Would you call it 109 or 109a? Here's a big pic of the reverse and all opinions are appreciated!

astrorat

O-109a = die cracks

lkeigwin

O.109.

Without virtually all of the other aspects (die cracks) it falls back to the original die state.
Lance.

Manorcourtman

Thanks Guys!

johnny9434

an 109 for sure

mozin

I don't see the A's as filled in, neither do I see the reverse cracks. This is the EDS, which is, I believe noticeably rarer than the LDS. NGC got it right.


109: A's not filled in & no reverse die cracks.

109a: A's filled at tops & reverse die cracks.

astrorat

<< <i>I don't see the A's as filled in, neither do I see the reverse cracks. This is the EDS, which is, I believe noticeably rarer than the LDS. NGC got it right.


109: A's not filled in & no reverse die cracks.

109a: A's filled at tops & reverse die cracks. >>

I don't think I have ever seen a "prime" die state for this marriage. Do you know if one exists?

lkeigwin

<< <i>

<< <i>I don't see the A's as filled in, neither do I see the reverse cracks. This is the EDS, which is, I believe noticeably rarer than the LDS. NGC got it right.


109: A's not filled in & no reverse die cracks.

109a: A's filled at tops & reverse die cracks. >>

I don't think I have ever seen a "prime" die state for this marriage. Do you know if one exists? >>


Several (4) have been reported by BHNC members. A's not filled at all, no die cracks.
Lance.