i'm still looking for my cc mm image display since an image is worth a thousand words. i'll post either a link to the thread or the image, whichever comes first. .
The CC is missing the serifs on the top of the Cs or tails. There is not enough wear on the coin to account for this. the seller is primarily a jewelry seller.
LOL, figured, but it's not over yet, just getting warmed up and letting her see what the price is today and then she'll be refreshing non stop tomorrow!
Moron bob
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
We still have 6 days 14 hrs left , pace yourself guys !!!
Looking for Atlanta $1-$20 Series 1928-present + Stars , Raw or Graded !! & FR-1509 ,FR-1509*,FR-1510,FR-1510*,FR-1511*,FR-1512*,FR-1514* in PCGS 66 or 67PPQ**
<< <i>The CC is missing the serifs on the top of the Cs or tails. There is not enough wear on the coin to account for this. the seller is primarily a jewelry seller. >>
Thanks for doing what other's felt so difficult to do.
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
<< <i>The CC is missing the serifs on the top of the Cs or tails. There is not enough wear on the coin to account for this. the seller is primarily a jewelry seller. >>
Thanks for doing what other's felt so difficult to do. >>
24000+ posts and you haven't seen any of the dozens of threads on cc mintmark morgans? i've seen many excellent informational txt and images from many members.
i thought you were just messing with us; not that simple observation of that cc year comparison image couldn't do the job. in any event, i truly hope you get it now. .
<< <i>The CC is missing the serifs on the top of the Cs or tails. There is not enough wear on the coin to account for this. the seller is primarily a jewelry seller. >>
Thanks for doing what other's felt so difficult to do. >>
24000+ posts and you haven't seen any of the dozens of threads on cc mintmark morgans? i've seen many excellent informational txt and images from many members.
i thought you were just messing with us; not that simple observation of that cc year comparison image couldn't do the job. in any event, i truly hope you get it now. . >>
You should have simply answered the question instead of being so obtuse.
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
Comments
Why does it seem so many high feedback US sellers are selling these?
linky
I'm high bidder!
bob
C'mom Mark F, let's play!
What makes you believe that its fake?
The name is LEE!
i lost a bit of interest of playing russian roulette since we never get to 7 figures. i need it just a couple times.
.
<< <i>I'm confused
What makes you believe that its fake? >>
are you mocking what the seller's response will be cuz u can't be serious
.
<< <i>
<< <i>I'm confused
What makes you believe that its fake? >>
are you mocking what the seller's response will be cuz u can't be serious
. >>
Enlighten me.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>. >>
Enlighten me. >>
i'm still looking for my cc mm image display since an image is worth a thousand words. i'll post either a link to the thread or the image, whichever comes first.
.
hope it helps
.
<< <i>.
hope it helps
. >>
No. It didn't help.
Are you implying that the mintmark is in the wrong position?? Or perhaps the wrong lettering style??
What?
The name is LEE!
http://www.pcgscoinfacts.com/Coin/Detail/7086
link
bob
<< <i>Okay, who outbid me now???
bob
probably a bigger moron that you
.
jeff
<< <i>
<< <i>Okay, who outbid me now???
bob
probably a bigger moron that you
. >>
LOL, figured, but it's not over yet, just getting warmed up and letting her see what the price is today and
then she'll be refreshing non stop tomorrow!
Moron bob
Looking for Atlanta $1-$20 Series 1928-present + Stars , Raw or Graded !! &
FR-1509 ,FR-1509*,FR-1510,FR-1510*,FR-1511*,FR-1512*,FR-1514*
in PCGS 66 or 67PPQ**
EBAY ITEMS
Check out - BrettEldredge.com !! Hometown Singer
<< <i>We still have 6 days 14 hrs left , pace yourself guys !!! >>
what???!!!!! at this rate, we'll never get to a 7-figure verdict
.
<< <i>OMG 42000.00 what if it is not cancled lol >>
i know what will happen. i watched a twilight zone episode about this very thing and the world ended!!
.
Wow, that would be a first for me, that's for sure. $77,000 was the highest I've ever been and it
was a lowly 1893s, not even a CC.
bob
<< <i>Dang, do you think we can get to 7 figures??? >>
idk. i've been wanting to try for a long while now but too many people run into limits
.
You guys sure have deep pockets.
<< <i>The CC is missing the serifs on the top of the Cs or tails. There is not enough wear on the coin to account for this. the seller is primarily a jewelry seller. >>
Thanks for doing what other's felt so difficult to do.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>
<< <i>The CC is missing the serifs on the top of the Cs or tails. There is not enough wear on the coin to account for this. the seller is primarily a jewelry seller. >>
Thanks for doing what other's felt so difficult to do.
24000+ posts and you haven't seen any of the dozens of threads on cc mintmark morgans? i've seen many excellent informational txt and images from many members.
i thought you were just messing with us; not that simple observation of that cc year comparison image couldn't do the job. in any event, i truly hope you get it now.
.
bob
<< <i>Carp, down now and no more bidding! Anybody know how high it got? $42,212 was the last I saw.
bob
that was the last price i saw.
.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>The CC is missing the serifs on the top of the Cs or tails. There is not enough wear on the coin to account for this. the seller is primarily a jewelry seller. >>
Thanks for doing what other's felt so difficult to do.
24000+ posts and you haven't seen any of the dozens of threads on cc mintmark morgans? i've seen many excellent informational txt and images from many members.
i thought you were just messing with us; not that simple observation of that cc year comparison image couldn't do the job. in any event, i truly hope you get it now.
. >>
You should have simply answered the question instead of being so obtuse.
The name is LEE!