part 2 of 1922 No D roll

lostincoins

here is the 1922 no d from the roll I was talking about earlier, could I get some feed back on it as the shop owner who was looking at it did make me an offer. He mad an offer based on the coin being a strong reverse at VG to F. Looking at PCGS for the photo comparison it looks like a VF30 to me. Thank you ahead of time for any info you provide. Insomnia sucks. Also sorry for the less than stellar photos, the sale of this and the other coin are going towards a good macro lens finaly.

amwldcoin

I would have sold that sucker faster than the smell could rise from a fresh pile of dog poop!

lostincoins

the offer stands I have to let him know by noon today (friday)

Type2

Yup it's a strong rev.

STONE

I agree with the coin shop owner - Fine at best

braddick

Your first reveal of the 1922 cent reverse looks different than your second photo (first in the original thread, the second in this one):

">1922 reverse (original thread)

">1922 reverse (this thread)

TomB

Is the white balance off? I ask because the color, especially on the reverse, looks mighty suspect to me.

braddick

Corrected photos:

phnatacc

<< <i>I would have sold that sucker faster than the smell could rise from a fresh pile of dog poop! >>



Would you go back and gloat over the dealers misfortune or never show your face around the shop again?

gonzer

Sure don't look alike.

joebb21

What braddick posted are 2 separate coins. The first is the strong reverse the 2nd is not.

I believe the grade is more vg than fine

UtahCoin

I know my eyes are going bad, but I think I see the remnants of a D. Anybody else see it?

BTW, what were the other dates in the roll?

MICHAELDIXON

The roll threads from this poster are becoming more and more interesting. Different coin pictures, etc makes me think he isn't on the up and up!

lostincoins

ok so like I stated this is the strong back is the second one I found in the roll! The weak back was an end coin displayed by the seller on ebay. the other coins of interest were 1911-D, 1912-D, 1914-S, 1924-D, and the others were just avg circ coins but none over 1938. Before slamming me maybe read the post from the beginning and see that I stated I was having a coin looked at and that is the strong back because I could not tell if it was a no D or a very weak D, The shop owner looked and looked and looked some more and said "in my opinion its a no d strong back" in an old man voice as he is 68 and silly grumpy in a good way. He then offered to buy it. I am not trolling for anything other than answers because I don't want to sell one of these and not have it right and I never offered it for sale on here, if I did it would be in the BST section. Thank you for your kind words, knowledge and encouragement.

PTVETTER

On the 22 no d strong rev
Isn't the second 2 stronger than the first?

erickso1

<< <i>ok so like I stated this is the strong back is the second one I found in the roll! The weak back was an end coin displayed by the seller on ebay. the other coins of interest were 1911-D, 1912-D, 1914-S, 1924-D, and the others were just avg circ coins but none over 1938. Before slamming me maybe read the post from the beginning and see that I stated I was having a coin looked at and that is the strong back because I could not tell if it was a no D or a very weak D, The shop owner looked and looked and looked some more and said "in my opinion its a no d strong back" in an old man voice as he is 68 and silly grumpy in a good way. He then offered to buy it. I am not trolling for anything other than answers because I don't want to sell one of these and not have it right and I never offered it for sale on here, if I did it would be in the BST section. Thank you for your kind words, knowledge and encouragement. >>



To be fair to the Saltys, I did read all your posts, went back and reread them, copied them into Word and analyzed them and could find no mention of you having a coin looked at that was a strong back until this thread, and even then there was no mention of a second 1922 no d. There was a vague mention of a guy looking at a second coin you pulled from the roll and after he gives his opinion you will post it.

I can see based upon your posts, how we would assume their was only one 1922 no d with a weak reverse, and would wonder why you were now posting a strong reverse.

I can post the entirety of your posts if you want, but understand that we do read and remember your posts. Thats why something wasn't adding up.

lostincoins

Got it I went back to It was vague and sorry for that now I am the salty one lol. I do apologize as I was just explaing to Bob I had not slept for almost 3 days because of a medical condition. I slam my self and again sorry for the ineffectual posting.

braddick

Not to pile on, but you did reference the same obverse for both of the different reverses.

Tree top version:
You show a single 1922 no P and discuss it.
You show an obverse and reverse of that single 1922 with no reference to a second 1922.

You start a second thread and show the same 1922 obverse yet now reference and show a vastly different reverse.
When called out on this discrepancy you state there are two 1922 coins located within the roll.

That sounds like you're playing fast and loose with the facts to bolster your claim the eBay auction was an excellent buy.
Sadly, upon first and second glance I'd have to disagree with you both on condition/grade and thread content.