Options
Poll: Would you call this "semi-proof-like choice BU?"

This pound is described as PL and BU. It definitely has some eye appeal, but upon closer inspection I see multiple black bits of debris. I also see scratches and marks, too many to list in one sentence. Finally, I'm not sure if that's cameo in the fields or darkened lighting. It looks more satiny than PL, IMHO. So ... what do you think? Would you slab it 65 or above (BU)? 








0
Comments
Probably not a 65 or cameo, though.
Jim
Anyway I've got a 64 with more luster and another I can't recall if it's 65 or 66 but I'm not going to bite this time ...
Amat Colligendo Focum
Top 10 • FOR SALE
I some years ago got a double mint set (3d, shilling, 2/6 and crown) in lucite at a Heritage auction and still like the design. Don't know why - maybe hoarding that make us want more of these...
Well, just Love coins, period.
I pulled out my album earlier this evening ... My 64 definitely has more luster, and my 65 blows this out of the water in terms of 'brightness' / reflection. The fields are definitely business, though. The second batch of photos here looks like it could be PL but I'd expect more reflection from the eagle. Instead it just looks duller and darker, IMO.
I bought and sold a true PL specimen last year, right here on the forum. Bought it raw, sold it slabbed. It was much deeper cameo compared to these photos.
So I feel like I ought ta be able to recognize another one. But as you said photos are difficult because you just never know what the angles and conditions were. But those scratches and black marks rub me the wrong way. I don't think it'll get the BU or PL. I'm going to say 63-64 or else Details. If I was the seller I'd have slabbed it first.
Amat Colligendo Focum
Top 10 • FOR SALE
Olmanjon
http://bit.ly/bxi7py