Milton Bradley Back Poll
handyman
Posts: 5,384 ✭✭✭✭✭
How many Milton Bradley Cards are in this group of 7?
0
Comments
Just by judging by the backs alone..
Good luck yall.
Also yours didnt even have the correct white line. Which was very obvious. Which was also funny.
Im glad this poll was your idea.
Thanks for the vote. I know you are not wrong in your mind even if you picked all 8 options.
And again I'm not berating you. I'm just trying to see how you can't grasp this.
I wont bring it up again as long as you don't..
((Please no kinfolk votes))
Bob
email bcmiller7@comcast.net
<< <i>1968 Topps Milton Bradley cards range from #'s 7-195. >>
game, set, match - the only card in the picture that has a chance of being a MB is the Koosman RC.
#captainobvious
Dodgers collection scans | Brett Butler registry | 1978 Dodgers - straight 9s, homie
Dodgers collection scans | Brett Butler registry | 1978 Dodgers - straight 9s, homie
Your saying your adding another important peace of info to tell how a Mitlon is a milton? You dont say!!
I hear you, I hope others do as well
Scott, Save that mays for another poll. You will get a yes if you do.
I just find it funny that soooooo many knowledgable collectors really have no idea about the issue....
11/29/12 eBay Image ichorsports1 1***r 29 $343.00
11/5/12 eBay Image wandw-auctions r***s 24 $218.01 MC
Ichriosports won the card from me and auctioned it off as soon as he got it in his hands! His winning buyer paid $130 more dollars, and cracked it out to sub to PSA as a MB variation!
The proof is in the pudding.....VCP members can see the scans for themselves.
Thanks for playing.
I find it irronic you know how to tell a milton by the white line on the front but yet you insisted yours was a milton bradley.
<< <i>Unfortunately otwcard, these were the Milton Bradley cards during the 1970's,.,.,,,
I just find it funny that soooooo many knowledgable collectors really have no idea about the issue.... >>
You really missed the point and obviously assume that I have no idea. It was a jab at the white line on the Mays and to those that insisted that the white line was the reason that a certain Ryan WAS when it WASN'T.
Irony . . .
<< <i>Here is the infamous "card"....the irony here is that the winning buyer purchased it with the intention of cracking and resubbing to get it into a Milton Bradley holder...ROTFLMAO!!!!!
11/29/12 eBay Image ichorsports1 1***r 29 $343.00
11/5/12 eBay Image wandw-auctions r***s 24 $218.01 MC
Ichriosports won the card from me and auctioned it off as soon as he got it in his hands! His winning buyer paid $130 more dollars, and cracked it out to sub to PSA as a MB variation!
The proof is in the pudding.....VCP members can see the scans for themselves. >>
Bobby,
I know that you don't want to concede, which is fine, but the overwhelming evidence is something you cannot ignore.
For those that don't know, read this thread first: LINK
Then take a look at Bobby's auction: LINK
And for easy reference, here are the images from the auction link:
You can continue to insist you're right and everyone else is wrong but that's a decision only you can make.
<< <i>Yes, they got it right....however, I in no way deserved the attacks that were made against me. This board is full of hypocrits. They have no qualms about buying a PSA 6 and then cracking it out and getting a PSA 8. However, when I submit a card that I believe in my heart is a Milton Bradley card and PSA grades it as such, who am I to beleive? This first grader who agreed with me or the 2nd grader who didn't?? Same as the crackout people....do you believe the grader who graded a card a '6' or the one who graded it an '8'?? >>
While I don't agree with his comparison to crackouts (that's apples to oranges IMO), he did concede at the time, though may have a change of heart now...
Also that Ryan is not the same color as the ryan in the group of 7.
Im sure you will want another poll. But what is the point. You said it is the same color.