Home PCGS Set Registry Forum

Success of the Modern Type & 20th Century Sets

Some statistics:

Modern Type Proof set -- 33 active sets, 8 complete
Modern Type MS set -- 32 active sets, 7 complete
Modern Type Mixed set -- 13 active sets, 4 complete

20th Century Gold Proof -- 0 active sets, 0 complete
20th Century Gold MS -- 8 active sets, 0 copmlete
20th Century Gold design -- 12 active sets, 9 complete

20th Century Mixed Basic -- 7 active sets, 5 complete
20th Century Mixed Variety -- 42 active sets, 6 complete

20th Century Proof Basic -- 0 active, 0 complete (couple pending)

20th Century MS Basic -- 9 active, 2 complete
20th Century MS Variety -- 14 active, 1 complete

Keith
Keith ™

Comments

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,146 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Now, how many Registry Collectors have multiple Type sets?

    peacockcoins

  • CarlWohlforthCarlWohlforth Posts: 11,074
    Most of us have both a gold type and a no gold type set. I saw names on many lists so I spread mine around too!
  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    Guilty as charged, I am in all of the following:

    Modern Type Proof set -- complete
    20th Century Gold design -- complete
    20th Century Gold MS -- never will finish
    20th Century Mixed Basic -- complete
    20th Century Mixed Variety -- complete
    20th Century MS Variety -- finish in a year or 2
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • keithdagenkeithdagen Posts: 2,025
    Most of the collectors have at least 2 sets, if not more registered.

    Couple of interesting insights early on, the Mixed set for Modern Type has not caught on as well as the die-hard sets (PR only, MS only). Also, when given the choice between a Basic set and a Varieity set, the Variety set has been winning except for gold where a "variety" piece there goes for $10K in AU.

    Keith
    Keith ™

  • cointimecointime Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Keith,
    Neat stats. One point I would add that I have noticed. The CS type sets appears to have generated some buying of real choice coins. image I wonder if this was spurred by comments made, about how the CS coins are harder to come by in higher grades with a higher price tag. Maybe they also noticed that there was no real competition mixing CS and PR. Any thoughts/comments?

    Kenny image
  • dbldie55dbldie55 Posts: 7,731 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Guilty as charged. I have none. But I am getting enough different coins that I could register one. (of course many are lower grade key coins)
    Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053
  • There is a huge advantage to those who buy the cheapest coin for the slot in the mixed set. A circulating strike only person is at a disadvantage because many slots can be filled with PR 69 DCAMs. But for those who buy oportunistically there is competiton.

    I am trying to see if there are more proof folks or more CS folks. I would have guessed CS but it looks pretty even.
  • cointimecointime Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Carl,
    I agree availability and opportunity creates competition. I guess I also wonder what the CS/PR ratio truly is. Also did the new sets have what the collectors really wanted and they only used the mixed sets as a stepping stone ?

    Kenny image
  • keithdagenkeithdagen Posts: 2,025
    dbldie55,

    We'll make you a Registrant one day yet. image
    Keith ™



  • << <i>Also did the new sets have what the collectors really wanted and they only used the mixed sets as a stepping stone ? >>


    I know that I for one, never wanted to play in a mixed set which is why I don't have one registered today. I've just got the 20th Century Type in Mint State (both "Major" and "Variations") and the Moden Type in Mint State.

    madmike
  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    If the sets were weighted correctly high grade CS coins would get more points than the dime a dozen PR69DCAMs. Which would even the playing field. I'll bet you then you would see mostly proof only and CS only Modern sets.
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
Sign In or Register to comment.