1804 c-3 half cent delisted
rxer
Posts: 280 ✭✭
Probably no one but other half cent collectors will appreciate this, but PCGS finally delisted the
1804 c-3 - was just an early die state of the 1804 c-5 ( I could never have afforded it in any
event) Now if some one can convince them the 1831 is a proof issue only
1804 c-3 - was just an early die state of the 1804 c-5 ( I could never have afforded it in any
event) Now if some one can convince them the 1831 is a proof issue only
palmer
0
Comments
<< <i>Probably no one but other half cent collectors will appreciate this, but PCGS finally delisted the
1804 c-3 - was just an early die state of the 1804 c-5 ( I could never have afforded it in any
event) Now if some one can convince them the 1831 is a proof issue only >>
Good luck with that one. The 1831 Original (C-1) is engrained in the 99-variety Cohen set, and there are too many people that have a financial interest in keeping it there.
<< <i>Probably no one but other half cent collectors will appreciate this, >>
it is a big deal to see it be official. any time one is added/removed from a series these days, imo, it is a big deal.
the 1825 n-5 that T.D. brought to light and a few other marriages being added/removed in various usa series are headline news so long as the info. is correct.
thanks for the update.
.
<< <i>
<< <i>Probably no one but other half cent collectors will appreciate this, but PCGS finally delisted the
1804 c-3 - was just an early die state of the 1804 c-5 ( I could never have afforded it in any
event) Now if some one can convince them the 1831 is a proof issue only >>
Good luck with that one. The 1831 Original (C-1) is engrained in the 99-variety Cohen set, and there are too many people that have a financial interest in keeping it there. >>
And, that's the problem......rather than do the right thing, money and connections stop it from happening......
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
<< <i>Probably no one but other half cent collectors will appreciate this, but PCGS finally delisted the
1804 c-3 - was just an early die state of the 1804 c-5 ( I could never have afforded it in any
event) Now if some one can convince them the 1831 is a proof issue only >>
And this is how many years after this was accepted by the copper community?
anyone that can/is willing to provide link(s) for reading about this would be nice.
or publications with this update.
.
a required coin in the Cohen registry set - leaves me painfully close to the 90 %
completion I had originally set my sights on to reach.
i wonder if EAC has recognition of the removal? Guess I need to do some digging before I cross it off my list.
.
<< <i>.
i wonder if EAC has recognition of the removal? Guess I need to do some digging before I cross it off my list.
. >>
A Cohen variety set consists of 99 coins, with the 1794 C-6b (up for auction in "The Missouri Cabinet" February 2014) being the only impossible stopper until someone finds another one, or this one gets bought.
1804 C-3's still bring a huge premium, even though they have been delisted. Don't hold your breath on the 1831 Original being delisted though - as commented on in my previous reply in this thread.
Taylor