Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Dear PSA

Assuming moderators or PSA reps read this....

Any chance you can start to update your articles and stories about the sets? I really enjoy reading them, but I think they have become somewhat pointless after 5-10 years. I read the one regarding the 1971 Topps baseball set with interest, then realized I was reading an article from 2006, which is why the population reports they were citing didn't make sense at all.

I'd love to see updates to all these articles with some quotes from new dealers and collectors as well as some of the latest findings, particularly the iconic ones like 1971, 1963, 1978, 1986F Basket, 1984 Football, etc
The Clockwork Angel Collection...brought to you by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Chase
TheClockworkAngelCollection

Comments

  • blee1blee1 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭
    image
    +1
    Skips PSA Exchange
    Successful transactions with: yankeeno7, raiderguy10, Beck6, CDsNuts, DaveP01, Dboneesq, Elemenopeo, gameusedhoop, georgebailey2, Goldlabels, gstarling, justmichael, etc

    Working on.........
    Tony Dorsett Master Set
    1977 Topps Mexican FB (raw)
    1957 Topps FB Set (raw or graded)
  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭✭
    How about some articles on the opc baseball sets!

    OPC baseball was once a product no one wanted. There is demand for it now.
    Most 60's -70's opc baseball sells higher than Topps.
    People want to know more about the opc cards, why they are so hard to find and find in high grade.

    I recently spoke to someone that helps with these article s and asked if he could do one on opc baseball.
    Was told he had a list of things in the works and hopes to do 1 at the end of the year in SMR.

    opcbaseball.com
  • gemintgemint Posts: 6,126 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Have they done an artical on unopened packs yet?
  • RookieWaxRookieWax Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Assuming moderators or PSA reps read this....

    Any chance you can start to update your articles and stories about the sets? I really enjoy reading them, but I think they have become somewhat pointless after 5-10 years. I read the one regarding the 1971 Topps baseball set with interest, then realized I was reading an article from 2006, which is why the population reports they were citing didn't make sense at all.

    I'd love to see updates to all these articles with some quotes from new dealers and collectors as well as some of the latest findings, particularly the iconic ones like 1971, 1963, 1978, 1986F Basket, 1984 Football, etc >>



    I think it would be pretty easy for PSA to link articles that have appeared in SMRs over the years to the particular sets. I am sure somewhere they have electronic copies of such articles they can use.


  • << <i>How about some articles on the opc baseball sets!

    OPC baseball was once a product no one wanted. There is demand for it now.
    Most 60's -70's opc baseball sells higher than Topps.
    People want to know more about the opc cards, why they are so hard to find and find in high grade.

    I recently spoke to someone that helps with these article s and asked if he could do one on opc baseball.
    Was told he had a list of things in the works and hopes to do 1 at the end of the year in SMR. >>




    O-PEE-CHEE was printed in Canada for the canadian market, there were alot less printed.
  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>How about some articles on the opc baseball sets!

    OPC baseball was once a product no one wanted. There is demand for it now.
    Most 60's -70's opc baseball sells higher than Topps.
    People want to know more about the opc cards, why they are so hard to find and find in high grade.

    I recently spoke to someone that helps with these article s and asked if he could do one on opc baseball.
    Was told he had a list of things in the works and hopes to do 1 at the end of the year in SMR. >>




    O-PEE-CHEE was printed in Canada for the canadian market, there were alot less printed. >>



    GREAT job, maybe we can get that added to all the sets!
    opcbaseball.com
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,281 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Assuming moderators or PSA reps read this....

    Any chance you can start to update your articles and stories about the sets? I really enjoy reading them, but I think they have become somewhat pointless after 5-10 years. I read the one regarding the 1971 Topps baseball set with interest, then realized I was reading an article from 2006, which is why the population reports they were citing didn't make sense at all.

    I'd love to see updates to all these articles with some quotes from new dealers and collectors as well as some of the latest findings, particularly the iconic ones like 1971, 1963, 1978, 1986F Basket, 1984 Football, etc >>



    +1

    Completely agree. The '79 set article is almost 7 years old now and is very dated when it comes to describing which cards are the real tough ones. When it comes to commons the set is not about Marc Hill ... it's all about Jerry Terrell! >>



    Agree with all. I am actually a participant in the 1978 article and I am even laughing at it now.

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

Sign In or Register to comment.