Would you rather have this for 155 million dollars?

I bought a 1977 Topps Mark Fidrych (the Bird) rookie in PSA 10 for 1.2K a few years ago, it is now a pop 4 and probably goes for double. It is the prize jewel of my collection as I have never loved a player like I did the bird as a little kid. There was a lot of moaning about a beautiful 1978 Molly/Trammell rookie in PSA 10 that just sold for a shade under 6K (pop 13). Afterwards, I glanced at Net54baseball and read about 6 different "collectors" bemoaning how stupid we are to pay that much for our cards (wont go back to that site, the posters are much less "informed" than the peeps here)...This Picasso just sold for 155,000,000.00. Somehow, I don't feel so bad. If I'm dumb I have no idea what to call the "idiot" that bought that monstrosity. This should get me through another couple months of "shill bidding" and "sheet cut" complaints.

75 Minis - GET IN MY BELLY!
0
Comments
Get ready to laugh...
Did you know that Steve actually ripped the picasso, and had it repaired before selling it to Cohen? He put a six inch gash in it with his elbow.
So that means a nine digit painting is actually altered! Lol. (Though just saying this for laughs, as such repairs are acceptable with art as opposed to cards).
That said I'd rather have a PSA 10 311 Mick than the painting
Cohen Picasso
This is why the ultra high end cards like a 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle PSA 10 overtime only go up. They are like pieces of art.
Raw cardboard nerd: Graded cardboard nerds are stupid!
Art Nerd: All Cardboard nerds are stupid!!!!
Graded cardboard nerd: *pisses on art nerd's interests*
Raw cardboard nerd: *pisses on graded cardboard nerd's interests*
Art Nerd: *pisses on all Cardboard nerds' interests*
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i>One other important fact. He also sold it for 16 million more then the originally agreed upon price.
Cohen Picasso
This is why the ultra high end cards like a 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle PSA 10 overtime only go up. They are like pieces of art. >>
I noted in another thread the same basis regarding cards for investment purposes. (cards as an investment is a whole other debate) While diversification is important, I think high grade examples of upper tier HOF's (mantle rookie, 68 clemente 3D, Ruth, Cobb, etc) will appreciate at a greater percentage then other cards. It's true that less people are able to bid on such items, but 2 collectors with deep pockets is all it takes to drive up the price of a baseball card piece of art.
<< <i>This Picasso just sold for 155,000,000.00. >>
Yeah, but it's a 1/1, and the art registry is a powerful drug.
Some of these hedge fund managers are so loaded that you simply can't compete with their spending power. I think if one hits the auction blocks the higher the price goes the more they will want it and most if not all of the estimates would end up being far too low.
<< <i>It would be really awkward to kiss that broad. >>
LOL Indeed, also, I would keep my hands away from her...uh...hair