Pretty lame, though maybe (just maybe) the seller doesn't know the diff and/or got it that way. (A longshot, perhaps, but maybe.)
I thought this was gonna be another one of those auctions where the coin was photographed in a strategic location in front of some voluptuous young assistant's cleavage.
He might as well take a fine tip Sharpie and change the 63 to a 68.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
It is deceptive description. Any attempt to alter a given grade by a TPG, even though it is poorly accomplished, is fraud. This auction should be taken down. Also noted, the BIN price is above the MS-64 grade.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
<< <i>The most over-promoted material is in coin publications IMHO. PQ+++ "Looks MS65!" "Sure to *****" "A coin even your wife will love!"
You never see the other side of the story unless the coin is in a problem holder. Too bad objectivity is so rare and sales overshadows critical analysis until...... >>
Least you forget, the advertisers who describe their offerings in coin publications ARE TRYING TO SELL THEM. Isn't it natural for a seller to describe their wares in a light most favorable?
I see a lot of red flags that make me also wonder if this might not be a counterfeit coin and slab. The coin looks nicer than any 63 I have ever seen and the seller says it is recently graded and PCGS has been using the prong holder for over a year now.
wow, that's a blatant misrepresentation! why not just put a purple sticker on it that says "Nice" or something. it would work just as well with people who are clueless.
<< <i>Absolutely, sales promotions and advertising is about selling not about truth telling necessarily; that is the job of consumer watchdogs of which there are many to which we owe a great deal. >>
That coin seems way short on contact marks for a 63. Hard to get a feel for luster from the photos. Maybe it is dipped out. Writing on the holder is even more annoying than crazy stickers and such, but the coin is what the coin is.
LOL. Seller has the wrong picture in the auction. Supposed to be a 2002 ungraded Shawnee Tribe 1/5 oz. gold piece in a pouch, not a NGC MS70 2007 $50G Buffalo. Lance.
Comments
Partner @Gold Hill Coin

Pretty lame, though maybe (just maybe) the seller doesn't know the diff and/or got it that way. (A longshot, perhaps, but maybe.)
I thought this was gonna be another one of those auctions where the coin was photographed in a strategic location in front of some voluptuous young assistant's cleavage.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
<< <i>The most over-promoted material is in coin publications IMHO. PQ+++ "Looks MS65!" "Sure to *****" "A coin even your wife will love!"
You never see the other side of the story unless the coin is in a problem holder. Too bad objectivity is so rare and sales overshadows critical analysis until...... >>
Least you forget, the advertisers who describe their offerings in coin publications ARE TRYING TO SELL THEM.
Isn't it natural for a seller to describe their wares in a light most favorable?
The coin looks nicer than any 63 I have ever seen and the seller says it is recently graded and PCGS has been using the prong holder for over a year now.
<< <i>Absolutely, sales promotions and advertising is about selling not about truth telling necessarily; that is the job of consumer watchdogs of which there are many to which we owe a great deal. >>
If you say so.
How about this ad?
<< <i>It's nice for a 63, I'll say that much. >>
I agree. I think it's a 63+. Seller told it like it was in as few words (zero) as possible.
All we ever hear is buy the coin, not the holder (or the felt tip magic marker plus). Looks like a nice coin regardless of everything else.
<< <i>another fine example of creative license
How about this ad? >>
LOL. Seller has the wrong picture in the auction. Supposed to be a 2002 ungraded Shawnee Tribe 1/5 oz. gold piece in a pouch, not a NGC MS70 2007 $50G Buffalo.
Lance.
Mark's 8TF Redux
Mark's 7/8TF Set
Mark's 7TF Set