Am I wasting my money getting these graded?
![bobbydigital731](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/barry.jpg)
Most of these cards are in poor condition except for a few, but I like them any because they are cool to have regardless of condition. Would I be wasting my time and money to get them graded just because I think they would look nicer in the cases? All of them are in poor condition. I would not feel so bad sending the 1970 McLain and the 1964 Kaline. McLain is probably the best looking wen terms of condition, but the Kaline I think is just a great looking card based on the picture.
0
Comments
1964 Topps Mantle, Brock and Kaline
1972 Topps Freehan, Cash
1958 Topps Mantle Sports Mag Card
1970 Topps McLain
1961 Topps Mays...bad condition haha couple of creases
1965 Topps Norm Cash
1972 Topps Mays...bad as well
Joe
See I thought it would be the exact opposite. If I was going to sell them, get them authenticated to show they are real. And if they are just for your collection don't worry about the grading. I am asking because I don't know and I am still learning. Thanks
-Brandon
Like has been suggested, I do not necessarily think you want to spend the money to submit them if you are not selling them and/or it won't substantially improve the value of the card.
-Brandon
I got my 1962 Topps #53 AL HR Leaders (Mantle/Maris/Killbrew/Gentile) graded because it was my first Mantle card. PSA 4 baby...but it's still my favorite card in my collection (followed closely by my '66 Koufax and '66 Aaron that will both grade 1 when I send them to PSA).
I say, go for it.
<< <i>As a general rule, grade all Mantles issued during his playing days. >>
I agree with this general rule about Mantles as for the rest I wouldn't get
them graded sell them raw.
James