Guess the grade of these Commems:

jmj3esq

Fresh from PCGS:

hockeyfan9

I like your Beaver!

bolivarshagnasty

I'll venture a 67,67, and 65. All great looking commem's!!!

lcoopie

66
66
64

mommam17

all 65's

erickso1

I was leaning 65's across the board, but I think the Columbian is in the 64 camp the more I look at it.

Placid

64
65
58

commoncents05

<< <i>66
66
64 >>



That was my guess as well.

-Paul

messydesk

Bay Bridge 65
Albany 65
Columbian 63

RollSearcher

66
67
64

nice commems!

richardshipp

67
67
64

jmj3esq

Well I just had these graded. Both the Bay Bridge and Albany were PCGS MS65. I thought they were both MS66. Pluse the Bay Bridge had a green CAC sticker. Well the the damn Bay Bridge came back MS64!. I dont see a flaw on it!

The Albany came back ast the same grade. MS65.

The Columbian came back MS63.

Im pissed about the Bay Bridge.

georgiacop50

66
66
59

mommam17

Sorry to hear about the very disappointing results.

Coinsponge

<< <i>Well I just had these graded. Both the Bay Bridge and Albany were PCGS MS65. I thought they were both MS66. Pluse the Bay Bridge had a green CAC sticker. Well the the damn Bay Bridge came back MS64!. I dont see a flaw on it!

The Albany came back ast the same grade. MS65.

The Columbian came back MS63.

Im pissed about the Bay Bridge. >>





My sympathy on that. I was thinking a 67 on the bridge bridge or at least 66 based on the pic. I almost always seem to judge higher than PCGS graders. Every now an then I am pleased with the outcome. Sure would be nice if they would explain the basis of their decision.

bolivarshagnasty

Unless the Bay Bridge and Albany have hairlines or something not seen in the pics, I don't see them as 65 coins. I can't discern a single contact mark on either! Sorry for the results. I have been there in a similiar situation. Regards

BryceM

My guesses were 66/65/63 (then I looked up the cert #s). I'd be interested to know what they saw on the Bay Bridge. There's obviously some problem that the photos don't show weoll. Are there hairlines? Is the luster not so great???

jmj3esq

Everything is great baout the Bay Bridge. I saw no hairlines. The luster is amazing too.

LindeDad

Comparing your Bay Bridge and mine I think I see yours as a slightly weaker strike but not much just a little in the collar hair on the bear. And I am surprised the Columbian made MS looks a lot like the AU58's I have had.

Type2

Still Nice. Sorry you did not get the grades you wanted.

Coinsponge

Seems like on of those coins you could resubmit and see the grades go up or down 2 points based on the grader. I figure you are sitting on the bottom of the range right now.

Kove

Before I looked at the results, my guesses were 65 65 64 (you didn't leave much time for us West-Coasters to guess before you posted the answers!).

The Bay Bridge should easily make 65 again, but it looks too "dipped" for a 66.

The problem is there's not enough spread in any of these Commem grades to justify additional grading fees.

CoinJunkie

<< <i>Well I just had these graded. Both the Bay Bridge and Albany were PCGS MS65. I thought they were both MS66. Pluse the Bay Bridge had a green CAC sticker. Well the the damn Bay Bridge came back MS64!. I dont see a flaw on it!

Im pissed about the Bay Bridge. >>


Bummer about the downgrade. I would suggest that since PCGS and JA saw the coin as [not 66], it
was a bit cavalier to crack it and hope for that grade. Probably would have made more sense
to try a regrade on that coin.

Wooly

Yea from the photos the bay bridge looks very solid, and better than a 64. I think you did we'll on the Columbian ,I would have guessed 58.

JustNeedCoins

66,66,64

coinkat

saw the results before I entered an opinion-

The Bay Bridge may be alittle washed out either in the picture or in reality

The Albany looks 66

The Columbian- and please don't be mad looks as if it was graded reasonably.