My gut feeling is altered surfaces, possibly repaired.
It is also grossly overgraded. Not all crooks are counterfeiters.
Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
If it was genuine, I'd give it a VF-20 grading. I'd stay away though... something strikes me as odd about the coin. Too many crisp spots and too many worn out spots. Nothing wrong with the two, but when you have them both together..
Comments
It is also grossly overgraded. Not all crooks are counterfeiters.
the 2/1 looks spot-on.
the images look to be heavily diffused which is partly what gives it this look imo. the plastic from the 2x2 doesn't help.
image courtesy of coinfacts
<< <i>Looks genuine to me. Owner's grading is a bit optimistic. >>
Yeah, for sure, by a few notches. It looks more F15 details, maybe VF20 to me...
mbogoman
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/classic-issues-colonials-through-1964/zambezi-collection-trade-dollars/7345Asesabi Lutho
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
-Paul
Interests:
Pre-Jump Grade Project
Toned Commemoratives