Third Party Descriptions??? Is there a "market" for this

The meaty paragraph in a good auction catalog says a LOT. The writing is top notch, the research into the coins pedigree and status within the issue is world class ......but, must we sell to get this quality description. Why not a way to have your coin professionally evaluated and described by an expert "cataloger". Seems to me this info would hold great value to the collector within his period of ownership. Also, to be able to have an independant evaluation in writing from an accepted service would hold much weight with eBay buyers.
0
Comments
You'll see the coins offerred with the original envelope with notes.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
It Was The Worst of Coins..."
I'm available......Paypal accepted
edited to add smiley
www.brunkauctions.com
This coin was described as twice bent, possibly as a "witch piece."
I remember thinking it went for stong money even though it was well bent twice. The description goes on to say "..usual irregular planchet for the variety with one moderate edge defect."
This was an XF uncertified coin, if I remember correctly.
The description of it being a possible "witch piece" ment to ward off witches, I believe played into the minds of the bidders.
Granted it came with providence; the Seller Collection. Which sometimes will make a coin bid higher than usual. This was the beginning of my collecting experience so I don't know the Seller Collection.
And I'm at a disadvantage of being not very knowledgable of colonial coins.
But it seemed to me the trend for pine tree shilliings at the time with issues like this and at this grade level were below $1,000
but I could be completely off base here, and will probably hear about it soon enough.
There was even part of a nursery rhyme was included in the print cataloge.
There was a crooked man and he walked a crooked mile,
He found a crooked sixpence upon a crooked stile.
From what I've gathered this nursery rhyme has nothing to do with "witches."
But to get back to the point I don't believe this coin would have sold for the final bid price without the "illustrated" style at which it was described.
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
This beautiful standing liberty quarter has a nice steel-grey patina, with wonderful dark accents in the devices. The outer edge has a few nice spots of toning. The date, although slightly worn, attests this piece has withstood many years of circulation. This coin is paramount to any collection.
Dennis
Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
<< <i>Why on earth would I consider paying someone else to write up a description of my own coin if I want to keep it? If I cannot do that myself, I am not worthy of the designation 'coin collector'. If the coin being described isn't one I want to keep, why should I pay? If I sell it to a dealer, he isn't going to be impressed with a description on a card. If it is consigned to an auction house, the house will have its staff do this job. >>
I agree but here's the thing....... I think a lot of folks would indeed use the service. These days more than I've ever seen is it matters more to people who says it's nice, and who they buy a coin from. Yes it's nice to get a compliment from someone that knows whey they speak of. I see some collectors worship certain dealers and if that dealer says a coin is nice they fall in love. Granted it might be an informed and respected opinion but I'm sure we've all seen some barkers for sale from some of the most respected sellers out there. Some might have come to them in trade, or some they think are great, and I might not feel the same.
Nobody will say a thing....... in public.
"A less then generous amount of mint brilliance blends awkwardly with a dull array of light brown, medium brown, and dark brown toning on the obverse The reverse is even worse. The strike is weak overall. Probably the last coin struck. The surfaces are choppy from ten feet away. Best viewed from 15. Indeed, the in-hand presence is lousy and lower end of the assigned grade is easily met. Undeniably a bad choice for the grade with an overall appeal that only a mother could love'
MJ
I would actually think there would be the tendency to write fluffy descriptions for the cash and it would prove fruitless.
Most don't want the truth
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
But I sure would have a hard time finding the words to describe some of the coins I have seen photos of online.
"A less then generous amount of mint brilliance blends awkwardly with a dull array of light brown, medium brown, and dark brown toning on the obverse The reverse is even worse. The strike is weak overall. Probably the last coin struck. The surfaces are choppy from ten feet away. Best viewed from 15. Indeed, the in-hand presence is lousy and lower end of the assigned grade is easily met. Undeniably a bad choice for the grade with an overall appeal that only a mother could love'
MJ
That's funny. Sorry, Ambro, as I am going a bit off the OP but I've got to try one now:
A coin only a blind mouse could love, the obverse screams unnatural, if not outright cleaned, scrubbed and overdipped. Not even a hint of a full head, and it only gets worse when you turn it over and look at the reverse. The last time the coin came up for auction, a couple of dealers dropped it during lot viewing and didn't bother to pick it up.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
<< <i>The last time the coin came up for auction, a couple of dealers dropped it during lot viewing and didn't bother to pick it up. >>
Funniest thing I've read on the forum this year (so far!)