Which average (am or pm) does the Mint use to determine prices?
Nooker
Posts: 634
The Mint's price for Platinum didn't go up this week, as I expected it would.
The last week's London PM close prices:
Thu 1/10 - $1621
Fri 1/11 - $1626
Mon 1/14 - $1658
Tues 1/15 - $1690
Wed 1/16 - $1678
my math says that's a $1654.60 average, and a Wed close of $1678 together says it's a Criteria 2, which says it should increase, which puts it in the $1992 Mint Price range.
Mint Pricing Guide
HOWEVER, if I use the London AM close numbers,
$1613
$1626
$1640
$1697
$1660
the average is $1647.20, which would NOT cause a price increase (Criteria 4, since the Wed PM close was in the next range up)
All along I've assumed that they use the PM close numbers for their weekly average, since they use the PM number for the Wed close price, but maybe they use the AM numbers for the weekly average. Their pricing guide does not mention which they use. I've called the Mint, and Customer Service doesn't know.
I would have to go back and do a lot of data analysis to see if there was ever another situation like this where the AM average is in a different range than the PM average.
Mark
The last week's London PM close prices:
Thu 1/10 - $1621
Fri 1/11 - $1626
Mon 1/14 - $1658
Tues 1/15 - $1690
Wed 1/16 - $1678
my math says that's a $1654.60 average, and a Wed close of $1678 together says it's a Criteria 2, which says it should increase, which puts it in the $1992 Mint Price range.
Mint Pricing Guide
HOWEVER, if I use the London AM close numbers,
$1613
$1626
$1640
$1697
$1660
the average is $1647.20, which would NOT cause a price increase (Criteria 4, since the Wed PM close was in the next range up)
All along I've assumed that they use the PM close numbers for their weekly average, since they use the PM number for the Wed close price, but maybe they use the AM numbers for the weekly average. Their pricing guide does not mention which they use. I've called the Mint, and Customer Service doesn't know.
I would have to go back and do a lot of data analysis to see if there was ever another situation like this where the AM average is in a different range than the PM average.
Mark
0
Comments
I feel that you would have noticed if this happened in the prior periods, but could be wrong. Maybe it was just oversight...
Based on the findings today, I would guess that they use AM pricing.
Do you know what time their system rolls over and changes the pricing? If it is early in the morning, maybe the only available "current" market pricing is London AM pricing.
Just thoughts, looking forward to your analysis though!
BST Transactions (as the seller): Collectall, GRANDAM, epcjimi1, wondercoin, jmski52, wheathoarder, jay1187, jdsueu, grote15, airplanenut, bigole
I've gone back over a year, and there is no other instance where this has happened (AM average in a different range than PM average, AND the Wed PM close is in a different range as well, which BOTH need to happen to result in a price change)
MintNewsBlog
In this article, he states that the AM close numbers are used for the weekly average.
I guess I've been using the wrong numbers for over a year. Looking back though, it hasn't changed any results other than this week.
Today, I learned something new
Mark
Btw, can I have a mulligan and get PM's at this price? Thanks lol
"When the new policy was adopted, the market price of gold was $827 and the market price of platinum was $964. "
BST Transactions (as the seller): Collectall, GRANDAM, epcjimi1, wondercoin, jmski52, wheathoarder, jay1187, jdsueu, grote15, airplanenut, bigole
I knew it would happen.