Home› Sports Talk
Options

so hitting the ground can't cause a fumble...

interchangesinterchanges Posts: 864 ✭
in Sports Talk
....but you have to maintain possession throughout a catch or it's incomplete?

NFL needs to seriously look at this conflict.

Just saw a play where an Indy receiver had possession, he was down.....rolled around a little and lost the ball.....incomplete.

But if he had lost the ball the second it hit the ground, it would be considered complete, no fumble.
WTH?

Comments

  • Options
    calaban7calaban7 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭
    I believe it might be an effort to spur on a little more offense . The ball would change hands many more times during the season and for those fans with an attention span shorter than a shaking rattle , this might be a fan base loss the league would rather not lose .

    Just my 2 cents----- Sonny
    " In a time of universal deceit , telling the truth is a revolutionary act " --- George Orwell
  • Options
    Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,363 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That was a completion. He made a FB move. Bad call, IMO.

    Dave
    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • Options
    alnavmanalnavman Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭
    fumbles are only good if your team ends up with it when they unpile.......no matter what the rule is.

    al.
Sign In or Register to comment.