Grading Opinion 1975 Topps Danny Frisella very low POP... Added another shot of the card
![Smokie](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/sscamaro-2.jpg)
I sent this card back in to PSA for another shot. Just curious on what you guys think its grade will be.
[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/819/scan343.jpg/]
[/URL]
Here is another shot of it
[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/585/scan00343.jpg/]
[/URL]
[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/819/scan343.jpg/]
![image](http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/6083/scan343.jpg)
Here is another shot of it
[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/585/scan00343.jpg/]
![image](http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/7258/scan00343.jpg)
0
Comments
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>8. The white dots kill the card at PSA. Ive sent in several that look Gem but get 7-8s because of a handful of white specs. >>
Agree that the surface issues are this card's greatest detriment. Not enough for a PD qualifier, but that would explain why it was graded lower
than you had hoped in the first place.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
I just feel or at least I hope I have a shot at a 9.
Actually the cards looks better than the scan, its more colorful.
When I get it back from PSA I'll post it.
With my luck I get 7.5 if I sub that. Maybe an 8.
ebay id Duffs_Dugout
My Ebay Auctions
PSA 8.5 is the best you can get.......
but the cards other flaws put it at PSA 8.
1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better
Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete