multi-denominational clashed die refuted by Kevin Flynn

errormaven

<< <i>
Hey Mike,

For the book, on the Lincolns, only included one as an example, I believe the 83 mad clash.

Thanks
Kevin
kevinjflynn88@yahoo.com >>



If the 1983 cent you refer to is the one with an inverted IBER over the date, it's not a misaligned die clash. It's a Type II counterclash. See this recent Coin World article if you're not familiar with this error type:

http://www.coinworld.com/Articles/ViewArticle/new-type-ii-counterclash-on-1985-cent-only-si#!prettyPhoto

I have discussed this error type in other Coin World columns and in Errorscope.

kevinj

<< <i>If the 1983 cent you refer to is the one with an inverted IBER over the date, it's not a misaligned die clash. It's a Type II counterclash. See this recent Coin World article if you're not familiar with this error type:
http://www.coinworld.com/Articles/ViewArticle/new-type-ii-counterclash-on-1985-cent-only-si#!prettyPhoto
I have discussed this error type in other Coin World columns and in Errorscope. >>



Mike,

Thanks for the info, I removed the 1983 Lincoln cent from the book as it was not applicable to the subjects and might tend
to be more confusing without a full discussion regarding it.

Thanks
Kevin