1906 Barber Dime RPD Not Listed in my Cherry Pickers

Jinx86

Found this piece unattibuted and figured Id look it up when I got home. Not sure if this is listed in the new book or not but I like it 06/06

bolivarshagnasty

C/P's guide edition 4 lists an FS-10-1906-301. Description reads, "The last two digits of the date are repunched, with the secondary digits evident west of the primary
digits. The secondary 0 in this photo does not show well. " Not sure about yours, as it appears to be North as opposed to west. Nice pickup however. I would have bought it
too. Mel

Jinx86

4Th edition is what Im using, mine appears to be north like you said.

DIMEMAN

That appears to be a RPD, but not the one in the CPG. Is it in the Barber dime book by David Lawrence or have you checked?

Jinx86

I actually dont have that book anymore. Traded it off, but was looking to buy another. Was also looking at this book possibly, THE AUTHORITATIVE REFERENCE ON BARBER DIMES by Kevin Flynn.

DIMEMAN

Must be glare or is there doubling in the tail of the 9? Looking in the Lawrence book there is a 1906/6 with doubling north on 6, but the date position is not right.

LanceNewmanOCC

.
it ought to go to someone at coneca
.

Jinx86

Im actually kind of excited about this find, not often I find something thats not listed in a dozen plus publications or listed in multiples of on Ebay.

mr1931S

Could be Lawrence No. 103 but the image here is too fuzzy to tell for sure.

Jinx86

Not sure if its appropiate to post pics out of a book, but if it seems deems ok id like to see what that variety looks like so I can compare.

DIMEMAN

It's not the one in the Lawrence book. The date position is wrong.

mr1931S

After further comparison,I agree with DIMEMAN.It's not L-103.

Jinx86

Ok, now my questions is who at Coneca should I send this to, any attributer in particular.